Registration of In Vivo Prostate Magnetic Resonance Images to Digital Histopathology Images

Early and accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer enables minimally invasive therapies to cure the cancer with less morbidity. The purpose of this work is to non-rigidly register in vivo pre-prostatectomy prostate medical images to regionally-graded histopathology images from post-prostatectomy specimens, seeking a relationship between the multi parametric imaging and cancer distribution and aggressiveness. Our approach uses image-based registration in combination with a magnetically tracked probe to orient the physical slicing of the specimen to be parallel to the in vivo imaging planes, yielding a tractable 2D registration problem. We measured a target registration error of 0.85 mm, a mean slicing plane marking error of 0.7 mm, and a mean slicing error of 0.6 mm; these results compare favourably with our 2.2 mm diagnostic MR image thickness. Qualitative evaluation of in vivo imaging-histopathology fusion reveals excellent anatomic concordance between MR and digital histopathology.

[1]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[2]  Thomas J. Polascik,et al.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Clare Allen,et al.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Olivier Rouvière,et al.  MR histological correlation: A method for cutting specimens along the imaging plane in animal or ex vivo experiments , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  P. Choyke,et al.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[8]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  G. Haas,et al.  Update on the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. , 2008, The Canadian journal of urology.

[10]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Block Matching: A General Framework to Improve Robustness of Rigid Registration of Medical Images , 2000, MICCAI.

[11]  Miguel Srougi,et al.  Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.