On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention.

Four experiments tested the hypothesis that objects toward which individuals hold attitudes that are highly accessible from memory (i.e., attitude-evoking objects) are more likely to attract attention when presented in a visual display than objects involving less accessible attitudes. In Experiments 1 and 2, Ss were more likely to notice and report such attitude-evoking objects. Experiment 3 yielded evidence of incidental attention; Ss noticed attitude-evoking objects even when the task made it beneficial to ignore the objects. Experiment 4 demonstrated that inclusion of attitude-evoking objects as distractor items interfered with Ss' performance of a visual search task. Apparently, attitude-evoking stimuli attract attention automatically. Thus, accessible attitudes provide the functional benefit of orienting an individual's visual attention toward objects with potential hedonic consequences.

[1]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[2]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[3]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively , 1989 .

[4]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  R. Zajonc Preferences Need No Inferences , 1980 .

[6]  W. Wilson,et al.  Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. , 1979 .

[7]  G. Herek Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. , 1987 .

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[9]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[10]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. , 1990 .

[12]  Thane S. Pittman,et al.  Perception Without Awareness , 1992 .

[13]  E. E. Jones Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[14]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[15]  Paula M. Niedenthal,et al.  Implicit perception of affective information , 1990 .

[16]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  M Moscovitch,et al.  The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Desirable Responding Triggered by Affect: Automatic Egotism? , 1987 .

[20]  Affect and social perception: On the psychological validity of rose-colored glasses. , 1992 .

[21]  M. Erdelyi,et al.  Cognitive masking in rapid sequential processing: The effect of an emotional picture on preceding and succeeding pictures , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall , 1979 .

[23]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[25]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Negativity in evaluations. , 1987 .

[26]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[27]  M. Zanna,et al.  Need for structure in attitude formation and expression. , 1989 .

[28]  R. Fazio On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. , 1989 .

[29]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[30]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[31]  Denise M. Driscoll,et al.  On the Functional Value of Attitudes: The Influence of Accessible Attitudes on the Ease and Quality of Decision Making , 1992 .

[32]  Kenneth G. DeBono Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. , 1987 .

[33]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[34]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[35]  D. Purcell,et al.  Probing "pop-out": Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. , 1989 .

[36]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitude Accessibility as a Function of Repeated Attitudinal Expression , 1984 .

[37]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  The role of attitude objects in attitude functions , 1990 .

[38]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Components of activation: repetition and priming effects in lexical decision and recognition. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[40]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[41]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and Personality. , 1956 .

[42]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Interaction between affect and cognition in word perception. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[44]  K. Ann Renninger,et al.  Effect Of Interest On Attentional Shift, Recognition, And Recall In Young Children , 1985 .

[45]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing , 1986 .

[46]  M. Erdelyi,et al.  Cognitive masking: The disruptive effect of an emotional stimulus upon the perception of contiguous neutral items* , 1973 .

[47]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.