A pragmatic approach to interactive assembly sequence evaluation

Abstract An assembly-oriented design system has been developed which includes several analysis tools to improve product assemblability during product development. One of these tools supports the parallel development of the product design and the assembly sequence, thus exploiting the benefits of concurrent consideration of product and process. However, this approach requires some method for evaluating the sequence against requirements. Previous work on assembly sequence evaluation has concentrated on identifying the best from a set of ranked alternatives. When a single sequence is constructed, as with this tool, another method is needed. This paper reports the development of this novel methodology for evaluating individual assembly sequences. A review of the relevant literature has found several measures for identifying good assembly sequences from a ranked list and the fundamental sequence attributes extrapolated and aggregated. This leads to the proposal of four new indices: insertion index, stability index, difficulty index and complexity index. A large number of assembly sequences have been analysed to define limiting values for the indices such that they can quantify the potential of an incomplete sequence resulting in a satisfactory solution. The application of these indices in concurrent design and assembly planning is illustrated through an industrial case study.

[1]  Friedrich M. Wahl,et al.  Assembly stability as a constraint for assembly sequence planning , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[2]  C. J. Barnes,et al.  A methodology for the concurrent design of products and their assembly sequence , 1999 .

[3]  Beatrice Lazzerini,et al.  A genetic algorithm for generating optimal assembly plans , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[4]  Jon Rigelsford,et al.  Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly 2/e , 2004 .

[5]  Graham Jared,et al.  Assembly oriented design , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP'99) (Cat. No.99TH8470).

[6]  S. S. Grewal,et al.  Assembly Planning Software , 1995 .

[7]  Saeid Motavalli,et al.  Multi-criteria assembly sequencing , 1997 .

[8]  S.J. Rhee,et al.  A design-specific approach to design-for-assembly (DFA) for complex mechanical assemblies , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP'97) - Towards Flexible and Agile Assembly and Manufacturing -.

[9]  R.H. Wilson,et al.  On constraints in assembly planning , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Complexity measures for assembly sequences , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  F. Bonneville,et al.  A genetic algorithm to generate and evaluate assembly plans , 1995, Proceedings 1995 INRIA/IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. ETFA'95.

[12]  Myung Jin Chung,et al.  A framework for the evaluation and selection of assembly plans , 1991, Proceedings IECON '91: 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation.

[13]  A. Bourjault,et al.  EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF ASSEMBLY PLANS , 1991 .

[14]  John K. Jackman,et al.  Evaluating assembly sequences for automatic assembly systems , 1995 .

[15]  K. G. Swift,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DESIGNERS' SANDPIT , 2001 .

[16]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Interactive evaluation of assembly sequences using augmented reality , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  H. S. Cho,et al.  A neural-network-based computational scheme for generating optimized robotic assembly sequences , 1995 .

[18]  Satoshi Kanai,et al.  ASPEN: Computer-Aided Assembly Sequence Planning and Evaluation System Based on Predetermined Time Standard , 1996 .