MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications

Evaluation of the intracranial circulation provides valuable information in the diagnosis and prognosis of various intracranial abnormalities and may influence patient management. Technical advances in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have improved the accuracy of this technique in various clinical situations, such as aneurysms, arterial and venous steno-occlusive diseases, vascular malformations, inflammatory arterial diseases, preoperative assessment of the patency of dural sinuses, and congenital vascular abnormalities. In many centers, MRA has replaced conventional digital subtraction angiography in screening for intracranial vascular disease, because of its non-invasive and non-ionizing character. Several MRA techniques have been developed for the imaging of the intracranial vascular system, such as time-of-flight MRA (TOF MRA), phase-contrast MRA (PC MRA), and more recently contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA). In the evaluation of steno-occlusive disease, the three-dimensional (3D) TOF-MRA technique is recommended for arterial evaluation, and the 2D TOF or 2D PC-MRA technique for venous evaluation. For the evaluation of aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), we recommend the 3D CE-MRA technique, especially dynamic sequences in case of AVM. In this review, the technical aspects, limitations, and optimization of these MRA techniques will be discussed together with their indications in intracranial disease.

[1]  B. Tress,et al.  Endovascular management of vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations presenting in the neonatal period. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  J. Meder,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of giant intracranial aneurysms , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[3]  J E Heiserman,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[4]  M. Alley,et al.  Partial fat-saturated contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with non-fat-saturated and conventional fat-saturated MR angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  R F Busse,et al.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Moyamoya disease: MRI and MR angiography , 1991 .

[7]  Rothschild Bm.  Limitations of invasive modalities in the diagnosis of primary angiitis of the central nervous system. , 1995 .

[8]  L. Pierot,et al.  Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  M. C. Han,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the diagnosis of intracranial vascular disease: optimal dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Kornhuber,et al.  [MR angiography in diagnosis of vasculitis and benign angiopathies of the central nervous system]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[11]  G. Schuierer,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[12]  S M Wright,et al.  A 16‐element phased‐array head coil , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[14]  A. Wilman,et al.  Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  Pulsed magnetization transfer contrast MRI by a sequence with water selective excitation. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[17]  F. Korosec,et al.  MR angiography: basic principles and theory. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[18]  M. R. Theobald,et al.  Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  P. Parizel,et al.  A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, European Radiology.

[20]  T. Carroll.  The emergence of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for intracranial angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  J. Ross,et al.  Intracranial circulation: preliminary clinical results with three-dimensional (volume) MR angiography. , 1989, Radiology.

[22]  H. Jäger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  N J Pelc,et al.  Determination of cerebral blood flow with a phase-contrast cine MR imaging technique: evaluation of normal subjects and patients with arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Radiology.

[24]  T. Hirai,et al.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[25]  H Bosmans,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial vessels. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[26]  A. Keogh,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a study of 51 cases , 1996, Neuroradiology.

[27]  D. Yousem,et al.  Hyperintense thrombus on GRASS MR images: potential pitfall in flow evaluation. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  A. Campi,et al.  Aneurysmal malformation of the vein of Galen in three patients: clinical and radiological follow-up , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[29]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  The non-invasive detection of intracranial aneurysms: are neuroradiologists any better than other observers? , 2003, European Radiology.

[30]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Characterisation of intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography , 1995, Neuroradiology.

[31]  P. Barber,et al.  Absent middle cerebral artery flow predicts the presence and evolution of the ischemic penumbra , 1999, Neurology.

[32]  D. Enzmann,et al.  Size determination of supratentorial arteriovenous malformations by MR, CT and angio , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[33]  J. Cottier,et al.  Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  J Hennig,et al.  Fast functional MRA using time‐resolved projection MR angiography with correlation analysis , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[36]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Dural arteriovenous fistula: a pitfall of time-of-flight MR venography for the diagnosis of sinus thrombosis , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[37]  E M Haacke,et al.  Optimizing blood vessel contrast in fast three‐dimensional MRI , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  K. terBrugge,et al.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations associated with moyamoya phenomenon. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[39]  W M Adams,et al.  The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[40]  J. Stone,et al.  CNS vasculitis in autoimmune disease: MR imaging findings and correlation with angiography. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[41]  A. Villringer,et al.  Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: comparison of acquisition techniques in healthy volunteers. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  J. Michiels,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[44]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[45]  T. Kuurne,et al.  MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[46]  J. Gauvrit,et al.  Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[47]  D. Dormont,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[48]  D Atkinson,et al.  Improved MR angiography: magnetization transfer suppression with variable flip angle excitation and increased resolution. , 1994, Radiology.

[49]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[50]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[51]  M. van Buchem,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. , 2000, Radiology.

[52]  G. Fürst,et al.  Factors Influencing Flow‐Induced Signal Loss in MR Angiography: An In Vitro Study , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[53]  P. Parizel,et al.  Phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. , 2003, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[54]  P. M. Parizel,et al.  3D time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: optimization of the technique with water excitation, parallel acquisition, eight-channel phased-array head coil and low-dose contrast administration , 2004, European Radiology.

[55]  C R Bird,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[56]  K. Tsuchiya,et al.  MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[57]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed? , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[58]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Part II. Early clinical experience. , 1992, Radiology.

[59]  N. Rofsky,et al.  Image subtraction in gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[60]  G. Scotti,et al.  Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[61]  R. Fulbright,et al.  MR of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: prevalence and spectrum of cerebrovascular malformations. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[62]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  Three‐dimensional phase contrast angiography , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[63]  M. Westphal,et al.  Clinical significance of pedicle aneurysms on feeding vessels, especially those located in infratentorial arteriovenous malformations. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[64]  V. Mathews,et al.  Combined effects of magnetization transfer and gadolinium in cranial MR imaging and MR angiography. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.