Local mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer

High overall mammographic density is associated with both an increased risk of developing breast cancer and the risk of cancer being masked. We compared local density at cancer sites in diagnostic images with corresponding previous screening mammograms (priors), and matched controls. VolparaTM density maps were obtained for 54 mammograms showing unilateral breast cancer and their priors which had been previously read as normal. These were each matched to 3 controls on age, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy usage, body mass index and year of prior. Local percent density was computed in 15mm square regions at lesion sites and similar locations in the corresponding images. Conditional logistic regression was used to predict case-control status. In diagnostic and prior images, local density was increased at the lesion site compared with the opposite breast (medians 21.58%, 9.18%, p<0.001 diagnostic; 18.82%, 9.45%, p <0.001 prior). Women in the highest tertile of local density in priors were more likely to develop cancer than those in the lowest tertile (OR 42.09, 95% CI 5.37-329.94). Those in the highest tertile of VolparaTM gland volume were also more likely to develop cancer (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.30-6.42). Local density is increased where cancer will develop compared with corresponding regions in the opposite breast and matched controls, and its measurement could enhance computer-aided mammography.

[1]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  I. Buchan,et al.  Prevention of breast cancer in the context of a national breast screening programme , 2012, Journal of internal medicine.

[3]  Yit Yoong Lim,et al.  The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[4]  Norman Boyd,et al.  Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Evaluation of a Novel Method of Measuring Breast Tissue Volumes , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Supplementary Screening Sonography in Mammographically Dense Breast: Pros and Cons , 2010, Korean journal of radiology.

[6]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[7]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Assessing Individual Breast Cancer Risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: A New Paradigm for Cancer Prevention , 2012, Cancer Prevention Research.

[8]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Localized Fibroglandular Tissue as a Predictor of Future Tumor Location within the Breast , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[10]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[11]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Same task, same observers, different values: the problem with visual assessment of breast density , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[13]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  A New Step-Wedge for the Volumetric Measurement of Mammographic Density , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[14]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[16]  N. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. , 1998, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.