Considerations for the future development of virtual technology as a rehabilitation tool

BackgroundVirtual environments (VE) are a powerful tool for various forms of rehabilitation. Coupling VE with high-speed networking [Tele-Immersion] that approaches speeds of 100 Gb/sec can greatly expand its influence in rehabilitation. Accordingly, these new networks will permit various peripherals attached to computers on this network to be connected and to act as fast as if connected to a local PC. This innovation may soon allow the development of previously unheard of networked rehabilitation systems. Rapid advances in this technology need to be coupled with an understanding of how human behavior is affected when immersed in the VE.MethodsThis paper will discuss various forms of VE that are currently available for rehabilitation. The characteristic of these new networks and examine how such networks might be used for extending the rehabilitation clinic to remote areas will be explained. In addition, we will present data from an immersive dynamic virtual environment united with motion of a posture platform to record biomechanical and physiological responses to combined visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive inputs. A 6 degree-of-freedom force plate provides measurements of moments exerted on the base of support. Kinematic data from the head, trunk, and lower limb was collected using 3-D video motion analysis.ResultsOur data suggest that when there is a confluence of meaningful inputs, neither vision, vestibular, or proprioceptive inputs are suppressed in healthy adults; the postural response is modulated by all existing sensory signals in a non-additive fashion. Individual perception of the sensory structure appears to be a significant component of the response to these protocols and underlies much of the observed response variability.ConclusionThe ability to provide new technology for rehabilitation services is emerging as an important option for clinicians and patients. The use of data mining software would help analyze the incoming data to provide both the patient and the therapist with evaluation of the current treatment and modifications needed for future therapies. Quantification of individual perceptual styles in the VE will support development of individualized treatment programs. The virtual environment can be a valuable tool for therapeutic interventions that require adaptation to complex, multimodal environments.

[1]  S. Kotaka,et al.  The influence of eye movements and tactile information on postural sway in patients with peripheral vestibular lesions. , 1986, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[2]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  CASE: a testbed for modeling, measurement and management , 1992, CACM.

[3]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[4]  Robert V. Kenyon,et al.  The effects of field of view size on the control of roll motion , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Fish tank virtual reality , 1993, INTERCHI.

[6]  T Kuhlen,et al.  Virtual reality for physically disabled people. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[7]  E. Viirre Vestibular telemedicine and rehabilitation. Applications for virtual reality. , 1996, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to a real environment in physically disabled children , 1996 .

[9]  J. Demer,et al.  Gaze stabilization during dynamic posturography in normal and vestibulopathic humans , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  M. Rosen Introduction to special topic issue on technology in neurorehabilitation , 1999 .

[11]  Kyoung Shin Park,et al.  Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[12]  Kyoung Shin Park,et al.  CAVERNsoft G2: a toolkit for high performance tele-immersive collaboration , 2000, VRST '00.

[13]  R. Kenyon,et al.  The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. , 2000, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[14]  L R Young Vestibular reactions to spaceflight: human factors issues. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition , 2001 .

[16]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  Varrier autostereographic display , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Rashid Ansari,et al.  Adaptive Networking for Tele-Immersion , 2001, EGVE/IPT.

[18]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Effectiveness of Virtual Reality–Based Pain Control With Multiple Treatments , 2001, The Clinical journal of pain.

[19]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Influence of action and expectation on visual control of posture. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of Characteristics of Image Quality in an Immersive Environment , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  Jason Leigh,et al.  Reliable Blast UDP : predictable high performance bulk data transfer , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[22]  R. Kenyon,et al.  Using Immersive Technology for Postural Research and Rehabilitation , 2004, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[23]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Automatic control of postural sway by visual motion parallax , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Chris Scharver,et al.  Robotics and Virtual Reality: A Perfect Marriage for Motor Control Research and Rehabilitation , 2006, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.