Active fault detection: A comparison of probabilistic methods

The paper deals with probabilistic methods for designing the active fault detectors that improve the quality of detection using an auxiliary input signal. Two probabilistic methods that assume a similar stochastic model of a monitored system are considered and compared with a special attention to various difficulties associated with active fault detector designs. The active fault detector design based on a general detection cost function is compared with the model sequence selection error minimization design in terms of assumptions and theoretical properties. Practical aspects of both methods are also considered and demonstrated through a numerical example.

[1]  L. Blackmore,et al.  Finite Horizon Control Design for Optimal Discrimination between Several Models , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Fault-Diagnosis Applications , 2011 .

[3]  Spyros G. Tzafestas,et al.  Generalized pseudo-Bayes estimation and detection for abruptly changing systems , 1993, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[4]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part I: Fault Diagnosis With Model-Based and Signal-Based Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  ディヴィッド ビー シュウォルツ,et al.  Active fault detection , 1998 .

[6]  Stephen L. Campbell,et al.  Auxiliary signal design for robust active fault detection of linear discrete-time systems , 2011, Autom..

[7]  Miroslav Simandl,et al.  Active fault detection and control: Unified formulation and optimal design , 2009, Autom..

[8]  Miroslav Simandl,et al.  Infinite time horizon active fault diagnosis based on approximate dynamic programming , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  M. Simandl,et al.  Adaptive Generalized Policy Iteration in Active Fault Detection and Control , 2015 .

[10]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Input design for guaranteed fault diagnosis using zonotopes , 2014, Autom..

[11]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Active Estimation for Jump Markov Linear Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  R. Nikoukhah,et al.  A mixed I approach to simultaneous fault detection and control , 2004, Autom..

[13]  Miroslav Šimandl,et al.  Approximate active fault detection and control , 2014 .

[14]  Miroslav Simandl,et al.  On infinite horizon active fault diagnosis for a class of non-linear non-Gaussian systems , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Dubravko Miljkovic,et al.  Fault detection methods: A literature survey , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention MIPRO.

[16]  Miroslav Simandl,et al.  Constrained Active Fault Detection and Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Henrik Niemann,et al.  A Setup for Active Fault Diagnosis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application , 1993 .

[19]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part II: Fault Diagnosis With Knowledge-Based and Hybrid/Active Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  A. T. Miller,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Controls and Diagnostics: The 4-Parameter Controller , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[21]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Active fault detection in MIMO systems , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[22]  Ramine Nikoukhah,et al.  Auxiliary Signal Design for Failure Detection , 2004 .

[23]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Active Fault Diagnosis Based on Stochastic Tests , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[24]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming - Solving the Curses of Dimensionality , 2007 .

[25]  Stephen L. Campbell,et al.  Effects of feedback on active fault detection , 2012, Autom..