Conflicting but close: Readers’ integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement

According to the documents model framework (Britt, Perfetti, Sandak, & Rouet, 1999), readers’ detection of contradictions within texts increases their integration of source–content links (i.e., who says what). This study examines whether conflict may also strengthen the relationship between the respective sources. In two experiments, participants read brief news reports containing two critical statements attributed to different sources. In half of the reports, the statements were consistent with each other, whereas in the other half they were discrepant. Participants were tested for source memory and source integration in an immediate item-recognition task (Experiment 1) and a cued recall task (Experiments 1 and 2). In both experiments, discrepancies increased readers’ memory for sources. We found that discrepant sources enhanced retrieval of the other source compared to consistent sources (using a delayed recall measure; Experiments 1 and 2). However, discrepant sources failed to prime the other source as evidenced in an online recognition measure (Experiment 1). We argue that discrepancies promoted the construction of links between sources, but that integration did not take place during reading.

[1]  S. Barzilai,et al.  The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints , 2015 .

[2]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  The Influence of Sourcing and Relatedness on Event Integration , 2006 .

[3]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text , 1980 .

[5]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[6]  G. McKoon,et al.  Pronoun resolution without pronouns: some consequences of memory-based text processing. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Searching the Web for conflicting topics: Page and user factors , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents , 2013 .

[9]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[10]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives , 2016 .

[12]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[13]  Kirsten Berthold,et al.  Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison , 2016 .

[14]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  The Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) Framework: Processes and Mechanisms , 2014 .

[15]  Buenos Aires,et al.  ASPECTOS SOCIO CULTURALES Y MÉTRICOS EN LA ADAPTACIÓN DE TESTS: UN ESTUDIO EN BASE AL DEL TEST DE INTELIGENCIA PARA ADULTOS DE WECHSLER III (WAIS-III). , 2004 .

[16]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Comprehending Multiple Documents on Scientific Controversies: Effects of Reading Goals and Signaling Rhetorical Relationships , 2014 .

[17]  Nicolas Vibert,et al.  Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension , 2011, Memory & Cognition.

[18]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[19]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Reading science texts online: Does source information influence the identification of contradictions within texts? , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Por qué son útiles los modelos computacionales de comprensión de textos , 2007 .

[21]  A. Schulman.  Memory for words recently classified , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[23]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information , 2014 .

[24]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Memory for Scientific Arguments and Their Sources: Claim–Evidence Consistency Matters , 2014 .

[25]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Reader's memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features , 2014 .

[26]  S. Rajaram,et al.  2.16 – Retrieval Processes in Memory , 2008 .

[27]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[30]  D. Dooling,et al.  Levels of Encoding and Retention of Prose1 , 1977 .

[31]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Students’ Sourcing While Reading and Writing From Multiple Web Documents , 2014 .

[32]  Emily R. Smith,et al.  Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources , 2016 .

[34]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. , 1999 .

[35]  H. Roediger,et al.  Semantic specificity in cued recall , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Internet-Based Communication , 2014, Discourse processes.

[38]  Herre Van Oostendorp,et al.  13. Updating mental representations during reading scientific text , 2002 .

[39]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[40]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[41]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[43]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence , 1993 .