A modularization method based on the triple bottom line and product desirability: A case study of a hydraulic product

Abstract The development of sustainable products is a process that is increasingly being studied and discussed by companies in the world today, where the concern with the material resources used throughout the chain of product transformation grows year after year, becoming a consideration for the preservation of the environment. In a scenario in which product modularization methods found in the literature do not take equally into account the economic, environmental and social dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line, as well as aspects related to product desirability by the customer, this article proposes a novel method for the modularization of products with an emphasis on the Triple Bottom Line, using as modularization criteria economic, environmental and social indicators. The method is divided into four steps: evaluate, decompose, format and integrate. The modularization process takes into account customer expectations, which are identified and classified using the Kano Model. The proposed method for sustainable modular design is relatively simple to apply, allowing information acquired by the company over time not to be lost. Also, based on the identified product desirability properties, priorities are established in the design of products in order to provide customer satisfaction, as well as his/her consideration of aspects related to sustainability. As a way to prove and observe the functionality of the method, it was applied to a product manufactured by a company of the metal-mechanic sector located in Southern Brazil.

[1]  Jérémy Bonvoisin,et al.  Target-oriented modularization--addressing sustainability design goals in product modularization , 2015 .

[2]  Erik Cambria,et al.  Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[3]  Xun Xu,et al.  Incorporating Quality Function Deployment with modularity for the end-of-life of a product family , 2015 .

[4]  Min Xie,et al.  An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD , 2000 .

[5]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[6]  Yu-Ying Huang,et al.  Suitable application situations of different postponement approaches: Standardization vs. modularization , 2008 .

[7]  Michael Mutingi,et al.  A Modular Product Design Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing in A Fuzzy Environment , 2017 .

[8]  Andres F. Clarens,et al.  A Review of Engineering Research in Sustainable Manufacturing , 2013 .

[9]  Aihua Huang,et al.  A FRAMEWORK AND METRICS FOR SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AT THE PRODUCTION LINE, PLANT AND ENTERPRISE LEVELS , 2017 .

[10]  Magnus Gustafsson,et al.  Replication of industrial ecosystems: the case of a sustainable biogas-for-traffic solution , 2015 .

[11]  Márcia Elisa Soares Echeveste,et al.  The role of modularity in sustainable design: A systematic review , 2018 .

[12]  Arturo Molina,et al.  Sensing, smart and sustainable product development (S3 product) reference framework , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives , 2012, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing.

[14]  J. Korhonen Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem , 2001 .

[15]  Seung Ki Moon,et al.  Sustainable platform identification for product family design , 2017 .

[16]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Towards sustainable consumption and production: Competitive pricing of modular products for green consumers , 2017 .

[17]  B. Datta,et al.  A study on the antecedents and consequences of customer delight , 2017 .

[18]  Rizauddin Ramli,et al.  Modelling and optimisation of upgradability in the design of multiple life cycle products: a critical review , 2016 .

[19]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  A CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR PRODUCT MODULARIZATION METHODS , 2011 .

[20]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A sustainable modular product design approach with key components and uncertain end-of-life strategy consideration , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[21]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Modularity, product variety, production volume and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Environmentally efficient weil-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts , 2009 .

[23]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Directions for instilling economic and environmental sustainability across product supply chains , 2016 .

[24]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[25]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[26]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING THE EFFECTS OF LEAN ON PRODUCTION COSTS WITH EVIDENCE FROM THE F-22 PROGRAM , 2009 .

[27]  Anthony S.F. Chiu,et al.  Sustainable consumption and production for Asia: sustainability through green design and practice , 2013 .

[28]  Zhitao Xu,et al.  Modularizing product extension services: An approach based on modified service blueprint and fuzzy graph , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Heriberto Maury,et al.  A novel approach to include sustainability concepts in classical DFMA methodology for sheet metal enclosure devices , 2018 .

[30]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[31]  Bert Bras,et al.  Product, process, and organizational design for remanufacture – an overview of research , 1999 .

[32]  Bimal Nepal,et al.  A methodology for integrating design for quality in modular product design , 2006 .

[33]  Márcia Elisa Soares Echeveste,et al.  Seleção de métodos para modularização no desenvolvimento de produtos: revisão sistemática , 2015 .

[34]  F. Székely,et al.  Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance , 2005 .

[35]  Kadra Branker,et al.  A STUDY OF ENERGY, CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS AND ECONOMICS IN MACHINING: MILLING AND SINGLE POINT INCREMENTAL FORMING , 2011 .

[36]  Daniel Capaldo Amaral,et al.  Integrating New Product Development Process References With Maturity and Change Management Models , 2007 .

[37]  Kai Yang,et al.  Design for Six Sigma , 2005 .

[38]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[39]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A Modular Product Design Method to Improve Product Social Sustainability Performance , 2015 .

[40]  Beata Walczak,et al.  Hierarchical clustering extended with visual complements of environmental data set , 2002 .

[41]  S. Evans,et al.  A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes , 2014 .

[42]  M. Mörtl,et al.  Current challenges for sustainable product development in the German automotive sector: A survey based status assessment , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[43]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[44]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[45]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment , 1998 .

[46]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A key components-based heuristic modular product design approach to reduce product assembly cost , 2018 .

[47]  C. Vila,et al.  An approach to conceptual and embodiment design within a new product development lifecycle framework , 2016 .

[48]  Stefan Keckl,et al.  Method for Evaluating Modularization Potential in Product Design Based on Production Time Variety , 2016 .

[49]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[50]  Emmanuel O. C. Mkpojiogu,et al.  Understanding the relationship between Kano model’s customer satisfaction scores and self-stated requirements importance , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[51]  W. P. Lewis,et al.  The Timely Allocation of Resources in the Concurrent Design of New Products , 1997 .

[52]  Runliang Dou,et al.  Application of combined Kano model and interactive genetic algorithm for product customization , 2016, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[53]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability , 2016 .

[54]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Integrated product and process design: A modularity perspective , 2002 .

[55]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Sustainability characterisation for manufacturing processes , 2014 .

[56]  C Berger,et al.  KANO’S METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER-DEFINED QUALITY , 1993 .

[57]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Value, Costs and Organizational Consequences of Modularity , 2003 .

[58]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Dennis E. Blumenfeld,et al.  Designing production systems for quality: Research opportunities from an automotive industry perspective , 2003 .

[60]  Bill Fulkerson A response to dynamic change in the market place , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[61]  M. Braungart,et al.  Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design , 2007 .

[62]  Lingfeng Chen,et al.  Modularity in building mass customization capability: The mediating effects of customization knowledge utilization and business process improvement , 2014 .

[63]  Matthieu Latapy,et al.  Computing Communities in Large Networks Using Random Walks , 2004, J. Graph Algorithms Appl..

[64]  M. Leonilde R. Varela,et al.  Decision Support Tool for Dynamic Scheduling , 2018, HIS.

[65]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology – the past, the present, and the future , 2013 .

[66]  Bimal Nepal,et al.  Integrated fuzzy logic-based model for product modularization during concept development phase , 2005 .

[67]  Engelbert Westkämper,et al.  A Method for Estimating and Evaluating Life Cycle Costs of Decentralized Component-based Automation Solutions☆ , 2014 .

[68]  A. R. Singh,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection criteria classification for Indian iron and steel industry: a fuzzy modified Kano model approach , 2020, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering.

[69]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Modular Design of Machine Tools to Facilitate Design for Disassembly and Remanufacturing , 2014 .

[70]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  An Investigation on Centralized and Decentralized Supply Chain Scenarios at the Product Design Stage to Increase Performance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[71]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line , 2012 .

[72]  Chun-Chih Chen,et al.  Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design , 2008 .