Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory

Abstract. The influence of temporal and spatial heterogeneity in seed availability on the foraging behaviour of the harvester ant Messor arenarius was studied in an arid shrubland in the Negev Desert, Israel. The study investigated the implications of behavioural responses to heterogeneity in seed availability for the seed predation process and the potential for feedback effects on vegetation. Vegetation and seed rain were monitored across two landscape patch types (shrub patches and inter-shrub patches) in 1997. Shrub patches were shown to have higher plant and seed-rain density than inter-shrub patches. Patch use and seed selection by M. arenarius foragers were monitored through the spring, summer and autumn of 1997. After a pulse of seed production in the spring, the ants exhibited very narrow diet breadth, specialising on a single annual grass species, Stipa capensis. At this time, ants were foraging and collecting seeds mainly from inter-shrub patches. In the summer, diet breadth broadened and use of shrub patches increased, although the rate of seed collection per unit area was approximately equal in the two patch types. The increase in the use of shrub patches was due to colony-level selection of foraging areas with relatively high shrub cover and an increase in the use of shrub patches by individual foragers. In the autumn, a pulse of seed production by the shrub species Atractylis serratuloides and Noaea mucronata led to a reduction in diet breadth as foragers specialised on these species. During this period, foragers exhibited a large increase in the proportion of time spent in shrub patches and in the proportion of food items collected from shrub patches. The seasonal patterns in foraging behaviour showed linked changes in seed selection and patch use resulting in important differences in the seed predation process between the two landscape patch types. For much of the study period, there was higher seed predation pressure on the inter-shrub patches, which were of relatively low productivity compared with the shrub patches. This suggests that the seed predation process may help maintain the spatial heterogeneity in the density of ephemeral plants in the landscape.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  Granivory in Desert Ecosystems , 1979 .

[2]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants , 1994 .

[3]  D. Davidson The effects of herbivory and granivory on terrestrial plant succession , 1993 .

[4]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Harvester Ant Foraging and Shrub‐Steppe Seeds: Interactions of Seed Resources and Seed Use , 1992 .

[5]  A. Shmida,et al.  Activity pattern of harvester ants (Messor spp.) in the Negev desert ecosystem , 1992 .

[6]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[7]  O. Reichman Desert Granivore Foraging and Its Impact on Seed Densities and Distributions , 1979 .

[8]  T. Schoener Generality of the Size-Distance Relation in Models of Optimal Feeding , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[9]  James A. MacMahon,et al.  Foraging Patterns of Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a Shrub–Steppe Ecosystem: The Roles of Temperature, Trunk Trails, and Seed Resources , 1991 .

[10]  M. Shachak,et al.  Desert Plant Communities in Human-Made Patches--Implications for Management , 1994 .

[11]  D. Tongway,et al.  Small-scale resource heterogeneity in semi-arid landscapes , 1994 .

[12]  D. Gordon,et al.  How resources and encounters affect the distribution of foraging activity in a seed-harvesting ant , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Desert Ecosystems: Environment and Producers , 1973 .

[14]  N. Scott,et al.  Temporal patterns of seed use and availability in a guild of desert ants , 1983 .

[15]  J. Traniello Foraging Strategies of Ants , 1989 .

[16]  O. Sala,et al.  Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  J. O. Klemmedson Distribution and Balance of Biomass and Nutrients in Desert Shrub Ecosystems , 1974 .

[18]  D. Davidson,et al.  FORAGING ECOLOGY AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION IN DESERT SEED-EATING ANTS' , 1977 .

[19]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[20]  James W. Haefner,et al.  Spatial Model of Movement and Foraging in Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmex) (II): The Roles of Environment and Seed Dispersion , 1994 .

[21]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Linking Ecological Understanding and Application: Patchiness in a Dryland System , 1997 .

[22]  Yosef Steinberger,et al.  A proposed mechanism for the formation of ‘Fertile Islands’ in the desert ecosystem , 1989 .

[23]  R. Bernstein,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGIES OF ANTS IN RESPONSE TO VARIABLE FOOD DENSITY , 1975 .

[24]  D. H. Janzen,et al.  Ecology of Foraging by Ants , 1973 .

[25]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  T. Philippi,et al.  Granivory and competition as determinants of annual plant diversity in the Chihuahuan desert , 1992 .

[27]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.