Mitigating contextual uncertainties with valuable changeability analysis in the multi-epoch domain

This paper details a method involving a series of metrics and visuals designed to assist in the determination of a single design or set of designs' valuable changeability in the multi-epoch domain of Epoch-Era Analysis (EEA). A brief introduction to the necessary concepts of EEA is included, with references for further information. Example application of these new metrics is provided in the form of a partial case study of a potential orbit-realigning space tug system. The metrics are demonstrated to give insight into the value added by changeability and the total value provided by changeability and robustness in tandem. Reference [12] is a companion paper, detailing additional metrics and methods used to value system changeability at the era level. Multi-epoch analysis is best suited for understanding the performance of systems across the space of potential future uncertainties when considering their ability to change design; era analysis uncovers additional time-dependent information related to lifetime value and applied change mechanism usage.

[1]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Responsive systems comparison method: Dynamic insights into designing a satellite radar system , 2009 .

[2]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2006 .

[3]  Stewart C. Myers,et al.  Finance Theory and Financial Strategy , 1984 .

[4]  Matthew E. Fitzgerald,et al.  8.4.1 Assessing Uncertain Benefits: a Valuation Approach for Strategic Changeability (VASC) , 2012 .

[5]  Blake Johnson,et al.  A Practical Method for Valuing Real Options: The Boeing Approach , 2007 .

[6]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Sustaining lifecycle value: Valuable changeability analysis with era simulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[7]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005 .

[8]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Time‐expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[9]  Matthew E. Fitzgerald,et al.  A Method Using Epoch-Era Analysis to Identify Valuable Changeability in System Design , 2011 .

[10]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems , 2009 .

[11]  Jeff G. Pierce,et al.  Designing flexible engineering systems utilizing embedded architecture options , 2010 .

[12]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[13]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating Survivability in Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2009 .

[14]  Rudolf Marcel Smaling,et al.  System architecture analysis and selection under uncertainty , 2005 .

[15]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design , 2004 .

[16]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Time-expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems , 2007 .

[17]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Quantifying Flexibility in Tradespace Exploration: Value Weighted Filtered Outdegree , 2009 .

[19]  David W. Miller,et al.  Assessing the performance of a heuristic simulated annealing algorithm for the design of distributed satellite systems , 2001 .

[20]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Combining Pareto Trace with Filtered Outdegree as a Metric for Identifying Valuably Flexible Systems , 2009 .

[21]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Using Pareto Trace to determine system passive value robustness , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[22]  Hugh McManus,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ORBITAL TRANSFER VEHICLE TRADE SPACE , 2003 .

[23]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example , 2006 .

[24]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value , 2008 .

[25]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Quantifying Flexibility for Architecting Changeable Systems , 2008 .