Brand recall of skippable vs non-skippable ads in YouTube: Readapting information and arousal to active audiences

By integrating the evidence of various audience theories, a comparison is made of viewers’ information processing of new interactive video advertising formats (skippable video ads) with traditional, non-skippable formats. The purpose of this paper is to focus on how exposure to a brand name at different moments during online video advertisements influences viewers’ recall.,A neuroscientific pre-test supported the selection of an arousing video, and a subsequent pre-test confirmed the scenario validity. Using a broader sample, the main study applied a 3×2 experimental design of different ad designs and formats.,Distinctions should be made between formats and audiences that lead to different information processing methods. Users exposed to skippable ads (active audiences) exert a higher control over advertising and tend to process the information presented in the initial part of an ad. In turn, users viewing non-skippable ads (passive audiences) should be exposed to the high arousal stimulus before presentation of the key information that the advertiser wants them to remember.,Advertising managers and content creators can use these results to improve the design of their online videos, and to achieve greater effectiveness in terms of information recall.,Skippable online videos have become a commonly used advertising format, but research into their effects is scarce. This study offers the first comparison of viewers’ reactions towards skippable vs non-skippable formats, in terms of brand recall and economic performance. Further research might extend this underdeveloped field of study and enhance the knowledge of video format processing in social media.

[1]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  Affective Responses to Images In Print Advertising: Affect Integration in a Simultaneous Presentation Context , 2008 .

[2]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Executional Factors and Advertising Effectiveness: A Replication , 1989 .

[3]  P. Herr,et al.  On the Development and Strength of Category–Brand Associations in Memory: The Case of Mystery Ads , 1992 .

[4]  Judith Gloppen,et al.  Perspectives on Design Leadership and Design Thinking and How They Relate to European Service Industries , 2009 .

[5]  S. Sundar,et al.  Using Theory of Interactive Media Effects (Time) to Analyze Digital Advertising , 2017 .

[6]  Duane Varan,et al.  Best Measures of Attention To Creative Tactics in TV Advertising , 2019, Journal of Advertising Research.

[7]  K. Evans,et al.  Perceived Believability of Research Results Information in Advertising , 1985 .

[8]  Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Interactivity in the electronic marketplace: An exposition of the concept and implications for research , 2005 .

[9]  Marc L. Resnick,et al.  Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , 2013 .

[10]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  Revisiting the Interactive Advertising Model (IAM) after 15 Years , 2017 .

[11]  W. E. Baker,et al.  DO NOT WAIT TO REVEAL THE BRAND NAME: The Effect of Brand-Name Placement on Television Advertising Effectiveness , 2004 .

[12]  Jia Tina Du,et al.  Understanding link sharing tools continuance behavior in social media , 2017, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  User adaptation to interactive advertising formats: The effect of previous exposure, habit and time urgency on ad skipping behaviors , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[15]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Evaluation of Internet Advertising Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citations from Key Sources , 2008 .

[16]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[17]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  Interactive Advertising and Presence , 2001 .

[18]  R. Winer New Communications Approaches in Marketing: Issues and Research Directions , 2009 .

[19]  J. Swait,et al.  Antecedents of True Brand Loyalty , 2008 .

[20]  P. Neijens,et al.  Program-Involvement Effects on commercial Attention and Recall of Successive and Embedded Advertising , 2012 .

[21]  Ben Agger,et al.  iTime: Labor and life in a smartphone era , 2011 .

[22]  C. Flavián,et al.  Understanding Interactive Online Advertising: Congruence and Product Involvement in Highly and Lowly Arousing, Skippable Video Ads , 2017 .

[23]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Eight social media challenges for marketing managers , 2016 .

[24]  Duane Varan,et al.  The Residual Impact of Avoided Television Advertising , 2010 .

[25]  K. Sheehan,et al.  Special Issue on Green Advertising , 2012 .

[26]  Hilke Plassmann,et al.  Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook , 2012 .

[27]  Veroline Cauberghe,et al.  The Impact of Banners on Digital Television: The Role of Program Interactivity and Product Involvement , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Bryan Bollinger,et al.  BYOB: How Bringing Your Own Shopping Bags Leads to Treating Yourself and the Environment , 2015 .

[29]  Colin Campbell,et al.  Understanding Why Consumers Don't Skip Pre-Roll Video Ads , 2017 .

[30]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[31]  Daniel Belanche,et al.  Instagram Stories versus Facebook Wall: an advertising effectiveness analysis , 2019, Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC.

[32]  C. Flavián,et al.  Consumer empowerment in interactive advertising and eWOM consequences: The PITRE model , 2020, Journal of Marketing Communications.

[33]  Louisa Ha Crossing Offline and Online Media , 2003 .

[34]  Eva A. van Reijmersdal,et al.  Introducing the PCMC Model: An Investigative Framework for Young People's Processing of Commercialized Media Content , 2010 .

[35]  Svetlana Bialkova,et al.  What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels , 2010 .

[36]  Shalom Levy,et al.  Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: the role of social capital , 2018, Online Inf. Rev..

[37]  Hilde A. M. Voorveld,et al.  The relation between actual and perceived interactivity: what makes the websites of top global brands truly interactive? , 2011 .

[38]  Bob T. W. Wu,et al.  The effects of pleasure and arousal on recall of advertisements during the Super Bowl , 2001 .

[39]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  CHILDREN'S RECALL OF TELEVISION AD ELEMENTS: An Examination of Audiovisual Effects , 2006 .

[40]  Chunling Yu,et al.  Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework , 2012 .

[41]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[42]  A. Kononova,et al.  Double-Dipping Effect? How Combining YouTube Environmental PSAs With Thematically Congruent Advertisements in Different Formats Affects Memory and Attitudes , 2015 .

[43]  Josefa D. Martín-Santana,et al.  The Effectiveness of Web ADS: Rectangle vs Contextual Banners , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[44]  Sundar Dorai-Raj,et al.  Empowering Online Advertisements by Empowering Viewers with the Right to Choose , 2012, Journal of Advertising Research.

[45]  D. MacInnis,et al.  Understanding Program-Induced Mood Effects: Decoupling Arousal from Valence , 2002 .

[46]  Jinhee Kim,et al.  Interactivity and Persuasion , 2005 .

[47]  Larry Lamb,et al.  Corporate Web sites in traditional print advertisements , 1999, Internet Res..

[48]  D. Rice,et al.  Should We Hire David Beckham to Endorse our Brand? Contextual Interference and Consumer Memory for Brands in a Celebrity's Endorsement Portfolio , 2013 .

[49]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[50]  Darrel D. Muehling,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus and Self-View in “Green” Advertising Message Framing , 2012 .

[51]  Hao Li,et al.  Do You Recognize Its Brand? The Effectiveness of Online In-Stream Video Advertisements , 2015 .

[52]  C. Yoo Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set , 2008 .

[53]  Banwari Mittal A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement , 1995 .

[54]  J. Maclachlan,et al.  The Effect of Pre-Questions on Advertising Recall , 1985 .

[55]  P. Chatterjee,et al.  Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts , 2003 .

[56]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[57]  George R. Milne,et al.  Social media as complementary consumption: the relationship between consumer empowerment and social interactions in experiential and informative contexts , 2016 .

[58]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[59]  Satya Menon,et al.  Managing the Power of Curiosity for Effective Web Advertising Strategies , 2002 .

[60]  R. Heath Low involvement processing—a new model of brands and advertising , 2000 .

[61]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Digital Advertising Clutter in an Age of Mobile Media , 2017 .

[62]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[63]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  The means-end cognitions of web advertising: a cross-cultural comparison , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[64]  K. Hazel Kwon,et al.  Is offensive commenting contagious online? Examining public vs interpersonal swearing in response to Donald Trump's YouTube campaign videos , 2017, Internet Res..

[65]  Jaime Gil-Lafuente,et al.  Considerations of Interactive Digital Television as Advertising Media , 2012 .

[66]  Keith Wilcox,et al.  Consumers’ Response to Commercials: When the Energy Level in the Commercial Conflicts with the Media Context , 2015 .

[67]  Kendall Goodrich Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes , 2011 .

[68]  Hairong Li,et al.  Measuring the Intrusiveness of Advertisements: Scale Development and Validation , 2002 .

[69]  Thomas Sutherland,et al.  Getting nowhere fast: A teleological conception of socio-technical acceleration , 2014 .

[70]  Louisa Ha,et al.  An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media , 2008 .

[71]  C. Yoo,et al.  Processing of animation in online banner advertising: The roles of cognitive and emotional responses , 2005 .

[72]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Moment-to-Moment Optimal Branding in TV Commercials: Preventing Avoidance by Pulsing , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[73]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Conversing and searching: the causal relationship between social media and web search , 2017, Internet Res..

[74]  Arthur A. Raney,et al.  At the movies, on the Web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive Web content on site and brand evaluations , 2003 .

[75]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Different Forced-Exposure Levels to Banner Advertisements , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[76]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential , 2013 .

[77]  R. J. Kent,et al.  Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity , 1994 .

[78]  Duane Varan,et al.  Getting the Balance Right , 2012 .

[79]  K. Poels,et al.  How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising , 2006 .

[80]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.