Oscillatory Phosphorylation of Yeast Fus3 MAP Kinase Controls Periodic Gene Expression and Morphogenesis

Signal-transduction networks can display complex dynamic behavior such as oscillations in the activity of key components [1-6], but it is often unclear whether such dynamic complexity is actually important for the network's regulatory functions [7, 8]. Here, we found that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) Fus3, a key regulator of the yeast mating-pheromone response, undergoes sustained oscillations in its phosphorylation and activation state during continuous pheromone exposure. These MAPK activity oscillations led to corresponding oscillations in mating-gene expression. Oscillations in MAPK activity and gene expression required the negative regulator of G protein signaling Sst2 and partially required the MAPK phosphatase Msg5. Peaks in Fus3 activation correlated with periodic rounds of cell morphogenesis, with each peak preceding the formation of an additional mating projection. Preventing projection formation did not eliminate MAPK oscillation, but preventing MAPK oscillation blocked the formation of additional projections. A mathematical model was developed that reproduced several features of the observed oscillatory dynamics. These observations demonstrate a role for MAPK activity oscillation in driving a periodic downstream response and explain how the pheromone signaling pathway, previously thought to desensitize after 1-3 hr, controls morphology changes that continue for a much longer time.

[1]  Albert Goldbeter,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic Oscillations of the Yeast Transcription Factor Msn2: Evidence for Periodic PKA Activation , 2007, Current Biology.

[2]  T. Elston,et al.  Systems biology analysis of G protein and MAP kinase signaling in yeast , 2007, Oncogene.

[3]  Necmettin Yildirim,et al.  Regulators of G Protein Signaling and Transient Activation of Signaling , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  J. Thorner,et al.  Sst2, a negative regulator of pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression, localization, and genetic interaction and physical association with Gpa1 (the G-protein alpha subunit) , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  Gordon L. Fain,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Physiology of Neurons , 1999 .

[6]  R. Deschenes,et al.  Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genes & development.

[7]  William F. Loomis,et al.  Periodic Signaling Controlled by an Oscillatory Circuit That Includes Protein Kinases ERK2 and PKA , 2004, Science.

[8]  W. Sabbagh,et al.  Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[9]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[10]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[11]  J. Segall,et al.  Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[13]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[14]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  FGF induces oscillations of Hes1 expression and Ras/ERK activation , 2008, Current Biology.

[15]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[16]  M. Snyder,et al.  Regulation of polarized growth initiation and termination cycles by the polarisome and Cdc42 regulators , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  E. Elion,et al.  Formin-induced actin cables are required for polarized recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold and high level activation of MAPK Fus3 , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  T. Elston,et al.  Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[19]  John R. Pringle,et al.  Bni1p, a Yeast Formin Linking Cdc42p and the Actin Cytoskeleton During Polarized Morphogenesis , 1997, Science.

[20]  J. Thorner,et al.  Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[21]  H. Sauro,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signaling networks. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[22]  T. Prószyński,et al.  O-glycosylation as a sorting determinant for cell surface delivery in yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[23]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  P. Patnaik.  Oscillatory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an overview of mechanisms and models. , 2003, Biotechnology advances.

[25]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[26]  B. Errede,et al.  Pheromone induction promotes Ste11 degradation through a MAPK feedback and ubiquitin-dependent mechanism , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  MSG5, a novel protein phosphatase promotes adaptation to pheromone response in S. cerevisiae. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[28]  Liang Qiao,et al.  Bistability and Oscillations in the Huang-Ferrell Model of MAPK Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..