Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Augmented with Polydioxanonsulphate Bands

During a 5.5-year period, we treated 64 patients with acute acromioclavicular separations by surgical recon struction. According to the classification of Rockwood and Matsen, 54 patients had type III lesions, 1 patient had a type IV lesion, and 9 patients had type V lesions. Both the coracoclavicular ligaments and the ligaments of the acromioclavicular joint were reconstructed. An additional ligamentous augmentation was performed using completely resorbable 5- and 10-mm polydiox anonsulphate bands. Forty-five patients (70%) were re- examined at 2 to 7.5 years after surgery (mean, 32 months). The results were good or excellent in 40 cases (89%). Forty-one patients (92%) achieved a range of motion with an abduction deficit of less than 20°. Cal cifications in the area of the coracoclavicular or acro mioclavicular ligaments did not affect the final range of motion. Complications consisted of one subcutaneous infection, one deep infection, and one failure of the re construction. Augmenting the reconstruction with poly dioxanonsulphate bands allowed an early functional postoperative treatment. With this procedure, patients do not require removal of an implant, and complications from breakage or migration of metal implants are avoided.

[1]  E. Wojtys,et al.  Conservative treatment of Grade III acromioclavicular dislocations. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  I. Dawson,et al.  Complete acromioclavicular dislocations: treatment with a Dacron ligament. , 1991, Injury.

[3]  G. Blatter,et al.  [Augmentation of the coraco-clavicular ligament suture. Comparison between wire cerclage, vicryl tape and PDS cord]. , 1990, Der Unfallchirurg.

[4]  M. Alexander,et al.  Comprehensive functional analysis of shoulders following complete acromioclavicular separation , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  G. Hanker,et al.  Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  E. Larsen,et al.  Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. A prospective, controlled, randomized study. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  W. M. Walsh,et al.  Shoulder strength following acromioclavicular injury , 1985, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  R. Hawkins,et al.  A comparative analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  B. Zaricznyj Reconstruction for chronic scapuloclavicular instability , 1983, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  W. D. Harris,et al.  Treatment of acromioclavicular separations , 1980, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  M. Rosenørn,et al.  A comparison between conservative and operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. , 1974, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  F. Allman Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  N. C. Mead,et al.  11 Acromioclavicular Separations: Useful and Practical Classification for Treatment , 1963, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.