论文信息 - Who Has Confused What? More On Lappin, Levine And Johnson

Who Has Confused What? More On Lappin, Levine And Johnson

Dans la continuite du debat s'articulant autour de la critique epistemologique du programme minimaliste faite par Lappin, Levine et Johnson (LLJ) en 2000 dans cette revue, l'A. revient sur certains points de desaccord avec LLJ notamment en ce qui concerne l'importance accordee au concept d'economie de derivation

I. Roberts

[1] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[2] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[3] Richard S. Kayne. Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[4] R. Larson. On the double object construction , 1988 .

[5] Noam Chomsky. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[6] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[7] Shalom Lappin,et al. Local Constraints Vs. Economy , 1998 .

[8] M. Brody,et al. Projection and Phrase Structure , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[9] Samuel David Epstein,et al. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations , 1998 .

[10] Shalom Lappin,et al. The Revolution Confused: A Response To Our Critics , 2000 .

[11] R. Levine,et al. The structure of unscientific revolutions , 2000 .

[12] M. Brody,et al. Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.