Simulating the dynamic behavior of Douglas-fir trees under applied loads by the finite element method.

The finite element method of structural analysis was used to model the dynamic behavior of three 20-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) trees subjected to applied loading. Detailed measurements of stem and branch geometry were made for each tree, enabling the first-order branches of each tree to be represented as individual cantilever beams attached to the stem. Three values for branch modulus of elasticity (E) were assumed: 4, 5 and 6 GPa. For two trees with relatively large crown masses (175 and 250 kg), significantly improved estimates of natural frequency were obtained when the branches were modeled as separate cantilever beams rather than as a series of discrete masses attached to the stem. Closest agreement with the results from field sway tests was found when branch E was 4 GPa. Oscillations of individual branches contributed to the damping of tree oscillations--a phenomenon known as structural damping--with the contribution increasing as branch E decreased. When branch E was 4 GPa, the phase difference between the oscillation of the stem and that of some branches was almost 180 degrees. We applied a series of forces separately to the stem and branches of each tree and determined the mechanical transfer function for each loading case. These transfer functions were similar to the theoretical transfer function for a damped harmonic oscillator, but showed a smaller tree response at higher loading frequencies, particularly when branch E was 4 GPa. Branch structural properties, particularly modulus of elasticity, appear to be important in defining overall tree behavior under applied loading.

[1]  Jiaojun Zhu,et al.  Wind speeds within a single crown of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.). , 2000 .

[2]  Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al.  Basic biomechanics of self-supporting plants: wind loads and gravitational loads on a Norway spruce tree , 2000 .

[3]  F. Telewski,et al.  Wind and Trees: Wind-induced physiological and developmental responses in trees , 1995 .

[4]  D. Logan A First Course in the Finite Element Method , 2001 .

[5]  G. J. Mayhead,et al.  Some drag coefficients for British forest trees derived from wind tunnel studies , 1973 .

[6]  H. R. Holbo,et al.  Aeromechanical behavior of selected Douglas-fir , 1980 .

[7]  Franka Brüchert,et al.  How do trees escape dangerously large oscillations , 2006 .

[8]  R. J. Astley,et al.  Finite Elements in Solids and Structures: An introduction , 1992 .

[9]  M. Cannell,et al.  Young's modulus of sections of living branches and tree trunks. , 1987, Tree physiology.

[10]  C. Mattheck,et al.  DESIGN AND GROWTH RULES FOR BIOLOGICAL STRUCTURES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO ENGINEERING , 1990 .

[11]  B Scannell,et al.  Quantification of the interactive motions of the atmospheric surface layer and a conifer canopy , 1983 .

[12]  Christopher Baker,et al.  The development of a theoretical model for the windthrow of plants , 1995 .

[13]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function , 1993 .

[14]  Thomas K. Flesch,et al.  Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocks. II. Relating measured tree sway to wind statistics , 1999 .

[15]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[16]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability , 1997 .

[17]  K. Rennolls,et al.  A Root Anchorage Model for Shallowly Rooted Sitka spruce , 1990 .

[18]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  A mathematical model to describe the dynamic response of a spruce tree to the wind , 1998, Trees.

[19]  Alan G. Davenport,et al.  Gust Loading Factors , 1967 .

[20]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Wind and Trees: The interactions of wind and tree movement in forest canopies , 1995 .

[21]  H. A. Smith,et al.  Forest products laboratory. , 1922 .

[22]  T. Fourcaud,et al.  A finite element model for investigating effects of aerial architecture on tree oscillations. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[23]  C. Baker,et al.  A dynamic analysis of windthrow of trees , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas K. Flesch,et al.  Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocks. I. Measured winds in experimental cutblocks , 1999 .

[26]  Alexia Stokes,et al.  A Numerical Investigation into the Influence of Soil Type and Root Architecture on Tree Anchorage , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[27]  T. Fourcaud,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the form and internal stresses of a growing tree by the finite element method , 1995 .

[28]  S. A. Neild,et al.  Estimating stem and root-anchorage flexibility in trees. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[29]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Wind and Trees: Turbulent airflow in forests on flat and hilly terrain , 1995 .

[30]  Douglas A. Maguire,et al.  Natural sway frequencies and damping ratios of trees: influence of crown structure , 2005, Trees.

[31]  H. Mayer,et al.  Wind-induced tree sways , 1987, Trees.

[32]  T. Speck,et al.  The mechanics of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst): mechanical properties of standing trees from different thinning regimes. , 2000 .

[33]  Oscillations of plants' stems and their damping: theory and experimentation. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.