An Investigation of Digital Payment Platform Designs: a Comparative Study of Four European solutions

This paper focuses on the triumph march of mobile phones that currently are annexing music players, navigation devices, and cameras as separate physical objects. The next target is set on payment. Through synthesizing available literature, we construct a framework for studying digital payment platforms that combines platform, technology and business design aspects. The framework is applied to conduct a comparative case study of digital payment platforms. Four types of market actors are considered: banks, mobile network operators, merchants, and startups, which are incumbents and disrupters in the payment industry. These actors issue four types of payment systems, and we can observe that three of four platforms types can be classified as multi-sided platforms (MSP). All alternatives seek foothold by issuing evolutionary payment instruments, which are intertwined with digital payment platforms. By hosting third-party services, payment instruments are evolving from single-purpose to multi-functional ones. Our research extends existing payment literature from the MSP perspective to emphasize certain digital payment platform components, which impact strategies and complementary products.

[1]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[2]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[3]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  William F. Baxter,et al.  Bank Interchange of Transactional Paper: Legal and Economic Perspectives , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[6]  Roberto Roson,et al.  Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets: The Case of Payment Networks , 2004 .

[7]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Preparing for the Future: Understanding the Seven Capabilities of Cloud Computing , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[8]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Julian Wright,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[10]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[11]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[12]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[13]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[14]  Patricia A. Adler,et al.  Intense Loyalty in Organizations: A Case Study of College Athletics. , 1988 .

[15]  Julian Wright,et al.  One-Sided Logic in Two-Sided Markets , 2003 .

[16]  Marc Rysman The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[18]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[20]  Erol Kazan,et al.  A Framework For Analyzing Digital Payment As A Multi-Sided Platform: A Study Of Three European NFC Solutions , 2013, ECIS.

[21]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  An Economic Analysis of the Determination of Interchange Fees in Payment Card Systems , 2003 .

[22]  Klaudia Frankfurter,et al.  Paying With Plastic The Digital Revolution In Buying And Borrowing , 2016 .

[23]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[24]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[25]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations , 2002 .