Search and the market for ideas

We study a market where innovators, who are good at coming up with ideas, can sell them to entrepreneurs, who might be better at implementing them. The market is decentralized, with random matching and bargaining. Ideas are characterized by five salient features: they are indivisible; partially nonrival; intermediate inputs; subject to informational frictions; and difficult to collateralize. This last feature gives rise to a demand by entrepreneurs for liquidity. We determine which ideas get traded in equilibrium and compare this to the efficient outcome, emphasizing the impact of bargaining and liquidity considerations. Among other applications, we study how outcomes in the idea market affect the labor market.

[1]  Philip H. Dybvig,et al.  Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Thomas J. Holmes,et al.  A Theory of Entrepreneurship and Its Application to the Study of Business Transfers , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[4]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Collaborative Product Development and the Market for Know-How: Strategies and Structures in the Biotechnology Industry , 1993 .

[5]  Ricardo Lagos,et al.  A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis , 2005 .

[6]  Liquidity, Innovation and Growth , 2012 .

[7]  Andrea Shepard Licensing to Enhance Demand for New Technologies , 1987 .

[8]  C. Shapiro,et al.  How to License Intangible Property , 1986 .

[9]  Randall Wright,et al.  Innovation and Growth with Financial, and Other, Frictions , 2011 .

[10]  Randall Wright,et al.  New Monetarist Economics: Models , 2010 .

[11]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[12]  A. Lusardi,et al.  Liquidity Constraints, Household Wealth and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[13]  Douglas Holtz-Eakin,et al.  Sticking it Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  A. Arora Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[15]  David S. Evans,et al.  Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship , 1989 .

[16]  M. Herrero The nash program: Non-convex bargaining problems , 1989 .

[17]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Management of Innovation , 1994 .

[18]  Spinoffs and the Market for Ideas , 2007 .

[19]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Licensing in the Theory of Innovation , 1985 .

[20]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[21]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  THE REAL EFFECTS OF LOCAL FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT , 2001 .

[22]  C. A. Pissarides,et al.  Equilibrium Unemployment Theory , 1990 .

[23]  Carlos J. Serrano The Market for Intellectual Property: Evidence from the Transfer of Patents , 2007 .

[24]  R. Fairlie The Absence of the African‐American Owned Business: An Analysis of the Dynamics of Self‐Employment , 1999, Journal of Labor Economics.

[25]  James A. Schmitz,et al.  On the Turnover of Business Firms and Business Managers , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  A. Trejos Search, Bargaining, Money, and Prices under Private Information , 1999 .

[27]  P. Bolton,et al.  A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development , 1997 .

[28]  Vincenzo Quadrini,et al.  Entrepreneurship, saving and social mobility , 2000 .

[29]  Wouter J. den Haan,et al.  Liquidity Flows and Fragility of Business Enterprises , 2000 .

[30]  Randall Wright,et al.  A uniqueness proof for monetary steady state , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[31]  D. Bernhardt,et al.  Enterprise, Inequality and Economic Development , 2000 .

[32]  R. Townsend,et al.  Entrepreneurship and financial constraints in Thailand , 2004 .

[33]  Bruce D. Meyer,et al.  Tax Policy and Entrepreneurial Entry , 2000 .

[34]  Randall Wright,et al.  Indivisibilities, Lotteries, and Monetary Exchange , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[35]  Randall Wright,et al.  Introduction to Search Theory and Applications , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[36]  M. Golosov,et al.  Business Start-ups, The Lock-in Effect, and Capital Gains Taxation , 2005 .

[37]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The venture capital cycle , 1999 .

[38]  R. Lucas ASSET PRICES IN AN EXCHANGE ECONOMY , 1978 .

[39]  R. Glenn Hubbard,et al.  Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales , 2000 .

[40]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[41]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  Aleksander Berentsen,et al.  Money and Information , 2002 .

[43]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[44]  James J. Anton,et al.  The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting , 2002 .

[45]  Randall Wright,et al.  Barter and monetary exchange under private information , 1991 .

[46]  Vincenzo Quadrini,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR WEALTH CONCENTRATION AND MOBILITY , 1999 .