Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty

For most people, facial beauty appears to play a prominent role in choosing a mate. Evidence from research on facial attractiveness indicates that physical beauty is a sexually selected trait mediated, in part, by pubertal facial hormone markers that signal important biological information about the displayer. Such signals would be ineffective if they did not elicit appropriate cognitive and/or emotional responses in members of the opposite sex. In this article, I argue that the effectiveness of these hormonal displays varies with perceivers' brains, which have been organized by the degree of steroid hormone exposure in the uterus, and activated by varying levels of circulating steroids following puberty. I further propose that the methodology used for examining mate choice decisions has general applicability for determining how cognitive and emotional evaluations enter into decision processes.

[1]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .

[2]  L. Henry.  Some data on natural fertility. , 1961, Social biology.

[3]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[4]  J. Simpson,et al.  Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Wedekind.  Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[7]  Andrew P. Clark,et al.  Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women's sociosexuality , 2004 .

[8]  S. Bem,et al.  Bem sex-role inventory : professional manual , 1981 .

[9]  M. Petrie,et al.  Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.

[10]  M. Andersson.  Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[11]  D B Hier,et al.  Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Miller.  The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature , 2000 .

[13]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[14]  E. Hampson,et al.  Spatial reasoning in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21‐hydroxylase deficiency , 1998 .

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Hormonal and immunological mechanisms mediating sex differences in parasite infection , 2004, Parasite immunology.

[16]  D. Waynforth,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Money,et al.  Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome: long-term medical, surgical, and psychosexual outcome. , 2000, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[18]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[19]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[21]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[23]  Susan C. Roberts,et al.  Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[25]  K. Grammer,et al.  Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design , 2001 .

[26]  V. Johnston,et al.  Individual differences in women's facial preferences as a function of digit ratio and mental rotation ability , 2005 .

[27]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The mystery of female beauty , 1999, Nature.

[28]  J. Flegr,et al.  Body height, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, fluctuating asymmetry and second to fourth digit ratio in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis , 2005, Parasitology.

[29]  Gordon Parker,et al.  The parental bonding instrument , 1979 .

[30]  J. T. Martin,et al.  Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: implications for early hormone exposure , 2004, Hormones and Behavior.

[31]  A. Matsumoto.  Sexual Differentiation of the Brain , 1999 .

[32]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[33]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A STUDY OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY , 1962 .

[34]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder , 1993 .

[35]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[36]  D. Trafimow,et al.  A theory about the translation of cognition into affect and behavior , 2004 .

[37]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. , 2004, Early human development.

[38]  D. Perrett,et al.  Concordant preferences for opposite–sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  V. Johnston.  Female facial beauty: The fertility hypothesis. , 2000 .

[40]  B. Buckingham,et al.  Cognitive and Behavioral Characteristics of Turner Syndrome: Exploring a Role for Ovarian Hormones in Female Sexual Differentiation , 2002, Hormones and Behavior.

[41]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[42]  James M. Tanner,et al.  Foetus into Man: Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity , 1978 .

[43]  C. Jennings-White.  Perfumery and the sixth sense , 1995 .

[44]  G. Jasienska,et al.  Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[46]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[47]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.