The impact of water use fees on dispatching and water requirements for water-cooled power plants in Texas.

We utilize a unit commitment and dispatch model to estimate how water use fees on power generators would affect dispatching and water requirements by the power sector in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas' (ERCOT) electric grid. Fees ranging from 10 to 1000 USD per acre-foot were separately applied to water withdrawals and consumption. Fees were chosen to be comparable in cost to a range of water supply projects proposed in the Texas Water Development Board's State Water Plan to meet demand through 2050. We found that these fees can reduce water withdrawals and consumption for cooling thermoelectric power plants in ERCOT by as much as 75% and 23%, respectively. To achieve these water savings, wholesale electricity generation costs might increase as much as 120% based on 2011 fuel costs and generation characteristics. We estimate that water saved through these fees is not as cost-effective as conventional long-term water supply projects. However, the electric grid offers short-term flexibility that conventional water supply projects do not. Furthermore, this manuscript discusses conditions under which the grid could be effective at "supplying" water, particularly during emergency drought conditions, by changing its operational conditions.

[1]  Johan Lilliestam,et al.  Modeling thermoelectric power generation in view of climate change , 2010 .

[2]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Novel methodology for evaluating economic feasibility of low-water cooling technology retrofits at power plants , 2013 .

[3]  Timothy J. Skone,et al.  Water: A critical resource in the thermoelectric power industry , 2008 .

[4]  Jordan Macknick,et al.  Water use for electricity in the United States: an analysis of reported and calculated water use information for 2008 , 2013 .

[5]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Coherence between Water and Energy Policies , 2013 .

[6]  K. Averyt,et al.  The water implications of generating electricity: water use across the United States based on different electricity pathways through 2050 , 2012 .

[7]  T. Karl,et al.  Global climate change impacts in the United States. , 2009 .

[8]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Technical analysis of a river basin-based model of advanced power plant cooling technologies for mitigating water management challenges , 2010 .

[9]  Bridget R. Scanlon,et al.  Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Nancy L. Barber,et al.  Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005 , 2009 .

[11]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Projection of California's Future Freshwater Requirements for Power Generation , 2010 .

[12]  Aaron Keith Townsend,et al.  A grid-level assessment of compressed air energy storage in ERCOT , 2013 .

[13]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Changing the spatial location of electricity generation to increase water availability in areas with drought: a feasibility study and quantification of air quality impacts in Texas , 2013 .

[14]  Robert R. Pierce,et al.  Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 1995 , 1998 .

[15]  Carol A. Dahl,et al.  A survey of energy demand elasticities in support of the development of the NEMS , 1993 .

[16]  G. Heath,et al.  Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature , 2012 .

[17]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Developing adaptive and integrative strategies for managing the electricity-water nexus , 2014 .

[18]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Identifying future electricity-water tradeoffs in the United States , 2009 .

[19]  Nancy L. Barber,et al.  Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000 , 2004 .

[20]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Evaluation of power generation operations in response to changes in surface water reservoir storage , 2013 .

[21]  China's Drought Strategies in Rural Areas along the Lancang river , 2013 .