Novel Ultrasound Read-Out for a Wireless Implantable Passive Strain Sensor (WIPSS)

In the early 20th century the first metallic bone plates and bone screws were introduced in orthopedic surgery for the fixation of long bone fractures. When such an implant is loaded, dedicated in-vivo measuring techniques may be required in order to determine, for instance, strains or forces in the device. The measured information can be used to optimize the design of future implants, to prevent a possible overload of the implant and to asses the healing process of the fracture. The most common in-vivo strain sensors are based on strain gauges and electromagnetic signal transmission. They contain electronic circuits, which are relatively expensive and require a special read-out unit. Therefore, a completely new strain measuring concept consisting of a wireless implantable passive strain sensor (WIPSS) with an ultrasound read-out has been developed. Currently, the WIPSS is entirely made of PMMA. However, it is even envisioned to fabricate the WIPSS from a biodegradable material in order to use it on an implant made of such a material as well. The WIPSS transforms the measured strain into a varying amount of fluid inside a micro channel, whose fill level linearly depends on the strain. The micro channel has a width of 0.1 mm and is wound into a spiral with a diameter of 5 mm. The aim of this work is to find a suitable ultrasound based read-out method, which is able to determine the fill level of the micro channel through inhomogeneous, attenuating and scattering human tissue of up to 50 mm. Under this precondition the acquired ultrasound data cannot provide the necessary lateral resolution of 0.1 mm to detect the fill level of the micro channel directly. Therefore, a novel read-out method was developed (patent application submitted). It is based on two fundamental requirements, which state: a) The quantity resulting from the areal integration of the C-scan of the micro channel linearly depends on the fill level. b) The measurement is independent of the acoustic parameters of the materials covering the WIPSS, if it is calibrated with the echo signal from a reference reflector inside the WIPSS. We derived an analytical model, which describes the entire transmit-receive process of an ultrasound transducer performing the read-out. It accounts for various system parameters, such as transducer aperture (single element or phased array), excitation function, F-number, electronic noise, shape of the micro channel, fill level, insonification angle, attenuation and dispersion. Therefore, the model is a valuable

[1]  A. Goodship The measurement of bone strain in vivo , 1992 .

[2]  T. Taxt,et al.  Two-dimensional noise-robust blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Frederick W. Kremkau,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles and Instruments , 1989 .

[4]  T. Taxt,et al.  Noise robust one-dimensional blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  M. Fink,et al.  Time Reversal of Ultrasonic Fields-Part I : Basic Principles , 2000 .

[6]  Richard A. Silverman,et al.  Wave Propagation in a Random Medium , 1960 .

[7]  A. J. Hayman,et al.  Observations of the propagation of very short ultrasonic pulses and their reflection by small targets , 1978 .

[8]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Focusing in transmit–receive mode through inhomogeneous media: The time reversal matched filter approach , 1995 .

[9]  F. N. Frenkiel,et al.  Waves In Layered Media , 1960 .

[10]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Measurements of bone strain in the walking animal. , 1969, Research in veterinary science.

[11]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[12]  CLINICAL ASPECTS OF ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT SURGERY , 1986 .

[13]  J.T.M. Verhoeven,et al.  Improvement of Lesion Detectability by Speckle Reduction Filtering: A Quantitative Study , 1993 .

[14]  P.M. Shankar,et al.  Speckle Reduction with Improved Resolution in Ultrasound Images , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[15]  R. Ling The Utilisation of Implants in Clinical Orthopaedics , 1986 .

[16]  V. A. D. Grosso,et al.  Speed of Sound in Pure Water , 1972 .

[17]  Alain Lhémery,et al.  Impulse‐response method to predict echo‐responses from targets of complex geometry. Part I: Theory , 1991 .

[18]  Dale W. Fitting,et al.  Ultrasonic Spectral Analysis for Nondestructive Evaluation , 1981 .

[19]  E. Jaynes,et al.  Kramers–Kronig relationship between ultrasonic attenuation and phase velocity , 1981 .

[20]  P. Walker,et al.  Forces and moments telemetered from two distal femoral replacements during various activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  CLINICAL IMAGING WITH TRANSMISSIVE ULTRASONIC COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY , 1981 .

[23]  J. A. Hudson,et al.  Acoustics of layered media I. Plane and quasi-plane waves L. M. Brekhovskikh and O. A. Godin, Springer Series on Wave Phenomena, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, x + 240 pp, hardcover ISBN 3-540-51038-9, DM 128. , 1991 .

[24]  R. Martin,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spatial Compounding of Ultrasound Scans with Weighting by Incidence Angle , 2000, Ultrasonic imaging.

[25]  W.D. O'Brien,et al.  Synthetic aperture techniques with a virtual source element , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  D. Bardos Metallurgy of Orthopaedic Implants , 1986 .

[27]  Raphaële Raillon,et al.  Impulse‐response method to predict echo responses from targets of complex geometry. Part II. Computer implementation and experimental validation , 1994 .

[28]  Y. Shikinami,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of novel spinal interbody fusion cages made of bioactive, resorbable composites. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[29]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  A novel approach to the 2-D blind deconvolution problem in medical ultrasound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  L. Claes,et al.  Mechanical characterization of biodegradable implants. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[31]  T. Taxt,et al.  Three-dimensional blind deconvolution of ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[32]  R. Bell,et al.  The use of biodegradable plates and screws to stabilize facial fractures. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[33]  E. Little,et al.  Perspectives of strain measurement techniques , 1992 .

[34]  H. Ermert,et al.  A 100-MHz ultrasound imaging system for dermatologic and ophthalmologic diagnostics , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  Peter A. Jansson,et al.  Traditional linear deconvolution methods , 1996 .

[36]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[37]  R. Jirik,et al.  Two-dimensional blind iterative deconvolution of medical ultrasound images , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[38]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  Blind deconvolution of ultrasound sequences using nonparametric local polynomial estimates of the pulse , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[40]  L. Schmerr Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation , 1998 .

[41]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurements of ultrasonic pulse arrival time differences produced by abdominal wall specimens. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  H. O'neil Theory of Focusing Radiators , 1949 .

[43]  Dale Ensminger,et al.  Ultrasonics : fundamentals, technology, applications , 1988 .

[44]  Thomas L. Szabo,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out , 2004 .

[45]  Josef Krautkrämer,et al.  Werkstoffprüfung mit Ultraschall , 1961 .

[46]  Peter A. Jansson Modern constrained nonlinear methods , 1996 .

[47]  T. Smit,et al.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[48]  J A Jensen,et al.  A model for the propagation and scattering of ultrasound in tissue. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  S.A. Goss,et al.  Computed Ultrasonic Reflection Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[50]  J. L. Duncan Strain measurement by thermoelastic emission , 1992 .

[51]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[52]  Dominique Placko,et al.  Modeling of ultrasonic fields by distributed point source method , 2003 .

[53]  Two- and three-dimensional photoelastic techniques , 1992 .

[54]  Mathias Fink,et al.  Green's function estimation in speckle using the decomposition of the time reversal operator: application to aberration correction in medical imaging. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  T. Meydan,et al.  Enhancement of magnetorestrictive properties of amorphous ribbons for a biomedical application , 1997 .