Risk Assessment of Human Exposure to Cypermethrin During Treatment of Mandarin Fields

The potential dermal and respiratory exposure assessment and risk assessment for applicator were performed with cypermethrin EC. The pesticide was applied on a mandarin field using a power sprayer. Gloves were used for the hand exposure assessment, mask for face, and dermal patches for the other parts of the body. Personal air monitor equipped with a XAD-2 resin was used for the respiratory exposure assessment. During the application of cypermethrin in the field, the rate of potential dermal exposure ranged from 28.1 to 58.8 mg/h. The major exposure parts were upper-arms (22.1–24.6%) and legs (thigh and shin, 28.3–29.2%) for females and thigh (21.0–46.9%) and hand (14.9–19.3%) for males. Females were exposed more than males. No exposure was detected from the respiratory monitoring. For risk assessment, the potential dermal exposure (PDE), the absorbable quantity of exposure (AQE), and the margin of safety (MOS) were calculated. Among those four risk assessments, MOS was <1 in only trial I, which indicated any possibility of risk. However, in the others, the possibility of risk was little. Moreover, the safe work time ranged from 3.61 h to 9.69 h.

[1]  Kyriaki Machera,et al.  EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL DERMAL EXPOSURE OF PESTICIDE SPRAY OPERATORS IN GREENHOUSES BY USE OF VISIBLE TRACERS , 2002, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.

[2]  R A Fenske,et al.  Multi-Route Exposure Assessment and Biological Monitoring of Urban Pesticide Applicators during Structural Control Treatments with Chlorpyrifos , 1990, Toxicology and industrial health.

[3]  C. E. Bernard,et al.  Biomonitoring and whole body cotton dosimetry to estimate potential human dermal exposure to semivolatile chemicals , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  J. G. Machado-Neto Determination of Safe Work Time and Exposure Control Need for Pesticide Applicators , 2001, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[5]  J. J. van Hemmen,et al.  Agricultural Pesticide Exposure Data Bases for Risk Assessment , 1992 .

[6]  J. H. Stamper,et al.  Pesticide exposure to greenhouse foggers , 1988 .

[7]  C. D. S. Tomlin,et al.  The Pesticide Manual , 2003 .

[8]  Janice K. Jensen The Assumptions Used for Exposure Assessments , 1984 .

[9]  J. H. Kim,et al.  Simultaneous determination of furathiocarb and metabolites in biological tissues by high-performance liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization , 2001 .

[10]  S. Tucker,et al.  Variation in cutaneous sensation between synthetic pyrethroid insecticides * , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  J. E. Lessenger Five office workers inadvertently exposed to cypermethrin. , 1992, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[12]  R. Krieger,et al.  Exposure to pesticide mixer/loaders and applicators in California. , 1992, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[13]  A. Renwick The use of safety or uncertainty factors in the setting of acute reference doses , 2000, Food additives and contaminants.

[14]  David J. Severn,et al.  Use of Exposure Data for Risk assessment , 1984 .

[15]  M. Lewis,et al.  Exposure while applying industrial antimicrobial pesticides. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  J. M. Martínez Vidal,et al.  Assessment of relevant factors and relationships concerning human dermal exposure to pesticides in greenhouse applications. , 2002, Pest management science.

[17]  W. F. Durham,et al.  Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides. , 1962, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  H I Maibach,et al.  Percutaneous penetration of some pesticides and herbicides in man. , 1974, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.