Co‐parenting through subsidiaries: A model of value creation in the multinational firm

Research summary We analyze a novel way to configure and manage multinational networks and propose a model of "co-parenting", characterized by the sharing of parenting roles and distribution of responsibilities between two units. We develop our argument around the notion of the springboard subsidiary, an operating subsidiary which assumes headquarters’ functions since it shares greater institutional closeness with both the headquarters’ country as well as with the host region. Based upon qualitative data, our inductive model revolves around three stages: establishment, consolidation and maturity, each of which reflects distinct roles and loci of decision making among the three actors involved: headquarters, springboard subsidiary and local subsidiary. Overall, our study sheds distinct light on when and how headquarters add value by matching parenting to context. Managerial summary In expanding across regions, multinational firms often face a situation where neither the local unit nor the corporate headquarters possesses the competencies to be at the competitive forefront. This article analyses a model of interregional expansion of multinational firms by using springboard subsidiaries, these being operating subsidiaries that can serve as a bridge between headquarters and local subsidiaries since they share institutional and business ties with both. We develop a model in which some parenting functions ---coordination, control and knowledge creation---are distributed between headquarters and the springboard subsidiary along an accumulative process of capabilities. By demonstrating how a springboard subsidiary can help to align control to context, the model offers a tool for strategic analysis that helps avoid potential value destruction by headquarters.

[1]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Multinational enterprise regional management centres: Characteristics and performance , 2017 .

[2]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Global, Local, or Regional? The Locus of MNE Strategies , 2016 .

[3]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Inside the regional multinationals: A new value chain perspective on subsidiary capabilities , 2016 .

[4]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do Firms Manage Strategic Dualities? A Process Perspective , 2016 .

[5]  Alan M. Rugman,et al.  Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance , 2013 .

[6]  Christian Geisler Asmussen,et al.  Unpacking Dimensions of Foreignness: Firm‐Specific Capabilities and International Dispersion in Regional, Cultural, and Institutional Space , 2013 .

[7]  Björn Ambos,et al.  Parenting Advantage in the MNC: An Embeddedness Perspective on the Value Added by Headquarters , 2013 .

[8]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[9]  Eva A. Alfoldi,et al.  Coordination at the Edge of the Empire: The Delegation of Headquarters Functions through Regional Management Mandates , 2012 .

[10]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  From Common to Uncommon Knowledge: Foundations of Firm-Specific Use of Knowledge as a Resource , 2012 .

[11]  J. Camps,et al.  Springboarding: a new geographical landscape for European foreign investment in Latin America , 2012 .

[12]  M. Forsgren,et al.  Rationality vs ignorance: The role of MNE headquarters in subsidiaries’ innovation processes , 2011 .

[13]  R. Piekkari,et al.  Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research , 2011, Research Methods in International Business.

[14]  Eric W. K. Tsang,et al.  Historical ties and foreign direct investment: An exploratory study , 2011 .

[15]  M. Gibbert,et al.  The ‘‘What’’ and ‘‘How’’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work , 2010 .

[16]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[17]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[18]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[19]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles , 2006, International Business Review.

[20]  David Pettifer,et al.  Redesigning the corporate centre , 2001 .

[21]  H. Yeung,et al.  Towards a Regional Strategy: The Role of Regional Headquarters of Foreign Firms in Singapore , 2001 .

[22]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  Unbundling European operations: regional management and corporate flexibility in American and Japanese MNCS , 1999 .

[23]  A. Lewin,et al.  Prolegomena on Coevolution: a Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[24]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy and parenting theory , 1998 .

[25]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  BUILDING FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE ROLE OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVE , 1998 .

[26]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[27]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  On the Rationales of Corporate Headquarters , 1997 .

[28]  J. Birkinshaw Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[29]  P. Lasserre Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets , 1996 .

[30]  Andrea L. Larson Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[31]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[32]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[33]  J. D. Couger E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[34]  William G. Egelhoff,et al.  Centralization in Headquarters–Subsidiary Relationships , 1986 .

[35]  G. Hedlund The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[36]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[37]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Managing the Embedded Multinational , 2005 .

[38]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[39]  A. Madhok COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[40]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .