Windowed mass selection method: a new data processing algorithm for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data

Abstract A number of preprocessing methods are tested on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) peptide map data, to determine the best and most efficient way to improve the signal to noise ratio in the data, especially at low analyte concentrations. Three methods are investigated, including an algorithm named “sequential paired covariance” (SPC), which was recently reported. An improvement to this algorithm is also reported here. This new, improved method, named the “windowed mass selection method” (WMSM), is shown to effectively eliminate random noise that occurs in the data. This method is shown to be particularly useful in improving signal to noise ratios in both chromatographic and mass spectra for data acquired in peptide mapping of recombinant DNA derived proteins.

[1]  B. Shushan,et al.  Characterization of the tryptic map of recombinant DNA derived tissue plasminogen activator by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 1991, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  Gordon A. Anderson,et al.  Application of sequential paired covariance to liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data enhancements in both the signal-to-noise ratio and the resolution of analyte peaks in the chromatogram , 1997 .

[3]  W. Windig,et al.  A Noise and Background Reduction Method for Component Detection in Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry , 1996 .

[4]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity for peptide mapping with electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the presence of signal suppression due to trifluoroacetic acid-containing mobile phases. , 1995, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  S. Fischer,et al.  Signal enhancement for gradient reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis with trifluoroacetic and other strong acid modifiers by postcolumn addition of propionic acid and isopropanol , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  B. Mehlis,et al.  Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of peptides of biological samples , 1997 .

[7]  John B. Fenn,et al.  Electrospray ionization–principles and practice , 1990 .

[8]  W. Hancock,et al.  Characterization of humanized anti-TAC, an antibody directed against the interleukin 2 receptor, using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry by direct infusion, LC/MS, and MS/MS. , 1994, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  W. Niessen,et al.  Advances in instrumentation in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and related liquid-introduction techniques. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[11]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Principles and practice of electrospray ionization—mass spectrometry for large polypeptides and proteins , 1991 .

[12]  Alan L. Rockwood,et al.  Application of sequential paired covariance to capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: Unraveling the signal from the noise in the electropherogram , 1995 .