Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques –WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

Objective This study presents the results of a systematic literature review conducted to determine most up-to-date information on the natural outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and the most reliable diagnostic techniques. Methods A literature search was performed for articles published during the last 10 years. Results The natural course of patients with cervical stenosis and signs of myelopathy is quite variable. In patients with no symptoms, but significant stenosis, the risk of developing myelopathy with cervical stenosis is approximately 3% per year. Myelopathic signs are useful for the clinical diagnosis of CSM. However, they are not highly sensitive and may be absent in approximately one-fifth of patients with myelopathy. The electrophysiological tests to be used in CSM patients are motor evoked potential (MEP), spinal cord evoked potential, somatosensory evoked potential, and electromyography (EMG). The differential diagnosis of CSM from other neurological conditions can be accomplished by those tests. MEP and EMG monitoring are useful to reduce C5 root palsy during CSM surgery. Notable spinal cord T2 hyperintensity on cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is correlated with a worse outcome, whereas lighter signal changes may predict better outcomes. T1 hypointensity should be considered a sign of more advanced disease. Conclusion The natural course of CSM is quite variable. Signal changes on MRI and some electrophysiological tests are valuable adjuncts to diagnosis.

[1]  H. Yamada,et al.  Can postoperative deltoid weakness after cervical laminoplasty be prevented by using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring? , 2019, Journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[2]  Kyeong-Woo Lee,et al.  The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy , 2018, Clinical interventions in aging.

[3]  Joseph S. Cheng,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical Review , 2018, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[4]  B. Sureka,et al.  Morphometric analysis of cervical spinal canal diameter, transverse foramen, and pedicle width using computed tomography in Indian population , 2018, Neurology India.

[5]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2017, Asian spine journal.

[6]  T. Tani,et al.  Localization of the primary sites of involvement in the spinal sensory and motor pathways for multilevel MRI abnormalities in degenerative cervical myelopathy , 2017, Spinal Cord.

[7]  D. Chou,et al.  The Accuracy of Multimodality Intraoperative Neuromonitoring to Predict Postoperative Neurologic Deficits Following Cervical Laminoplasty. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[8]  Jefferson R. Wilson,et al.  The Natural History of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Rate of Hospitalization Following Spinal Cord Injury: An Updated Systematic Review , 2017, Global spine journal.

[9]  A. Curt,et al.  Assessing structure and function of myelin in cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2017, Neurology.

[10]  A. Curt,et al.  Improved Diagnosis of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Contact Heat Evoked Potentials. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  N. Nishida,et al.  Use of Central Motor Conduction Time and Spinal Cord Evoked Potentials in the Electrophysiological Assessment of Compressive Cervical Myelopathy , 2017, Spine.

[12]  M. Fortin,et al.  Preoperative Computed Tomography Myelography Parameters as Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of a Systematic Review , 2017, Global spine journal.

[13]  Remi M. Ajiboye,et al.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases. , 2017, Spine.

[14]  L. Dušek,et al.  Prevalence and Imaging Characteristics of Nonmyelopathic and Myelopathic Spondylotic Cervical Cord Compression , 2016, Spine.

[15]  N. Adachi,et al.  The relationship between central motor conduction time and spinal cord compression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2016, Spinal Cord.

[16]  M. Fehlings,et al.  The Relationship Between Preoperative Clinical Presentation and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Allan R. Martin,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. , 2016, Neurosurgical focus.

[18]  S. Golaszewski,et al.  The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review , 2016, Spinal Cord.

[19]  Allan R. Martin,et al.  Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: A systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[20]  L. Holly,et al.  Prediction of Neurological Impairment in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy using a Combination of Diffusion MRI and Proton MR Spectroscopy , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  E. Chroni,et al.  Usefulness of cervical root magnetic stimulation in assessing proximal motor nerve conduction. , 2015, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  Yong Shen,et al.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: focusing on the quantitative signal intensity , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[23]  G. Yin,et al.  Relationship Between Signal Changes on T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Images and Cervical Dynamics in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[24]  Hatem M. I. Salem,et al.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the prediction of outcome following surgical intervention in 93 patients using T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Noriko Salamon,et al.  Advances in MR imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[26]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[27]  S. Deftereos,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation but not MRI predicts long-term clinical status in cervical spondylosis: a case series , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[28]  D. Mikulis,et al.  Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Surgical Outcome in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[29]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Do Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters Correlate With the Clinical Presentation and Functional Outcomes After Surgery in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy? A Prospective Multicenter Study , 2014, Spine.

[30]  H. Baba,et al.  Prognostic value of changes in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[31]  R. Marsh,et al.  Specific pattern of gadolinium enhancement in spondylotic myelopathy , 2014, Annals of neurology.

[32]  C. Chung,et al.  Cervical extension magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2014, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[33]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Pathophysiology and Natural History of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[34]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics That Affect Treatment Decision Making and Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[35]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Frequency, Timing, and Predictors of Neurological Dysfunction in the Nonmyelopathic Patient With Cervical Spinal Cord Compression, Canal Stenosis, and/or Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament , 2013, Spine.

[36]  V. Di Lazzaro,et al.  The role of motor-evoked potentials in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[37]  A. Davis,et al.  Assessment of Spinal Cord Compression by Magnetic Resonance Imaging—Can It Predict Surgical Outcomes in Degenerative Compressive Myelopathy? A Systematic Review , 2013, Spine.

[38]  R. Lebel,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging Correlates with the Clinical Assessment of Disease Severity in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Predicts Outcome following Surgery , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[39]  A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen,et al.  Upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis evaluated by triple stimulation technique and diffusion tensor MRI , 2013, Journal of Neurology.

[40]  E. Chung,et al.  Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing cervical spinal canal compression. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Natural Course and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Mild Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy With Increased Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, Spine.

[42]  K. Luk,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of somatosensory tract in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its link with electrophysiological evaluation. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[43]  F. Ståhlberg,et al.  The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion MR measurements: a Monte Carlo simulation study , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[44]  M. Yamagata,et al.  Normal morphology, age-related changes and abnormal findings of the cervical spine. Part II: magnetic resonance imaging of over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[45]  J. Greenlee,et al.  Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[46]  Rory K. J. Murphy,et al.  The Natural History and Clinical Presentation of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2011, Advances in orthopedics.

[47]  A. Vedantam,et al.  Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[48]  G. Mundis,et al.  Correlation between transcranial motor and somatosensory-evoked potential findings in cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy during cervical spine surgery , 2011, Neurological research.

[49]  N. Thakor,et al.  Time jitter of somatosensory evoked potentials in recovery from hypoxic–ischemic brain injury , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[50]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Neurological Recovery After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Prospective Study With Blinded Assessments , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[51]  J. Lazennec,et al.  Preoperative Evaluation of the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy With Flexion-Extension Magnetic Resonance Imaging: About a Prospective Study of Fifty Patients , 2011, Spine.

[52]  Heung Sik Kang,et al.  New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment , 2011, HSS Journal ®.

[54]  V. Rajshekhar,et al.  Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[55]  S. Acharya,et al.  Resolution of Physical Signs and Recovery in Severe Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy After Cervical Laminoplasty , 2010, Spine.

[56]  Y. Kato,et al.  Etiology of Cervical Myelopathy Induced by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Determining the Responsible Level of OPLL Myelopathy by Correlating Static Compression and Dynamic Factors , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[57]  A. Sharan,et al.  Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation and Correlation to Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2010, Spine.

[58]  E. Hui,et al.  In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of chronic spinal cord compression in rat model , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[59]  Timothy C Ryken,et al.  Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[60]  T. Ryken,et al.  Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[61]  T. Ryken,et al.  Preoperative patient selection with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and electroencephalography: does the test predict outcome after cervical surgery? , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[62]  J. Rhee,et al.  Prevalence of Physical Signs in Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective, Controlled Study , 2009, Spine.

[63]  S. Deftereos,et al.  Localisation of cervical spinal cord compression by TMS and MRI. , 2009, Functional neurology.

[64]  L. Holly,et al.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate spinal cord axonal injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[65]  Vedran Deletis,et al.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[66]  L. Dušek,et al.  Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[67]  M. Caroli,et al.  Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[68]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Deterioration of Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy After Nonsurgical Treatment , 2007, Spine.

[69]  A. Sestokas,et al.  Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[70]  J. Harrop,et al.  Asymptomatic Cervical Stenosis: To Operate or Not? , 2007 .

[71]  Moe R. Lim,et al.  Characterization of Neurophysiologic Alerts During Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery , 2006, Spine.

[72]  H. Baba,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the neurological outcome of surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[73]  S. Maier,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: Age and cervical spondylosis–related changes , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[74]  P. Fillard,et al.  MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[75]  L. Dušek,et al.  Predictive factors for mild forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically , 2005, European journal of neurology.

[76]  B. Tay,et al.  Natural history of cervical myelopathy , 2004 .

[77]  L. Dušek,et al.  Presymptomatic Spondylotic Cervical Cord Compression , 2004, Spine.

[78]  T. Sakou,et al.  Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[79]  Yih-Ru Wu,et al.  The use of evoked potentials for clinical correlation and surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary high signal intensity on MRI , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[80]  T. Albert,et al.  Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[81]  T. Albert,et al.  Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Detection of Iatrogenic C5 Nerve Root Injury During Laminectomy for Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 2002, Spine.

[82]  R. Lyu,et al.  Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. , 2001, Radiology.

[83]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Relationships Between Outcomes of Conservative Treatment and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients With Mild Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Soft Disc Herniations , 2001, Spine.

[84]  H. Goto,et al.  Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. prediction of treatment effects by multivariate analysis. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[85]  E. Benzel,et al.  The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: Results of a multicenter study. , 1999, Spine.

[86]  D. Resnick,et al.  Classification system based on kinematic MR imaging in cervical spondylitic myelopathy. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[87]  K. Takeshita,et al.  Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: achievement and sustainability of a level of "no disability". , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[88]  K. Nagata,et al.  Cervical myelopathy in elderly patients: clinical results and MRI findings before and after decompression surgery , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[89]  H. Bohlman,et al.  Intraoperative Improvements of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: Correlation to Clinical Outcome in Surgery for Cervical Spondylitic Myelopathy , 1996, Spine.

[90]  Chein-wei Chang,et al.  Measurement of Motor Conduction in the Thoracolumbar Cord: A Possible Predictor of Surgical Outcome in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 1996, Spine.

[91]  T. Ushida,et al.  Surgical treatment guided by spinal cord evoked potentials for tetraparesis due to cervical spondylosis , 1995, Paraplegia.

[92]  S. Katoh,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Results of Surgery for Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 1993, Spine.

[93]  A. Sciarretta,et al.  Usefulness of motor evoked potentials in compressive myelopathy. , 1993, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[94]  T. Ikata,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Spinal Cord Plasticity in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy , 1991, Spine.

[95]  E. Benzel,et al.  Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[96]  M. Dillingham,et al.  Normal Cervical Spine Morphometry and Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Asymptomatic Professional Football Players: Plain Film Radiography, Multiplanar Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1991, Spine.

[97]  A. Inoue,et al.  Clinical Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Cervical Myelopathy , 1990, Spine.

[98]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Chronic cervical cord compression: clinical significance of increased signal intensity on MR images. , 1989, Radiology.

[99]  R. R. Smith,et al.  Myelopathic cervical spondylotic lesions demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[100]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Increased MR signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression , 1987, Neuroradiology.

[101]  H. Pavlov,et al.  Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. , 1987, Radiology.

[102]  K. Shichikawa,et al.  Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[103]  H. Larocca,et al.  The Developmental Segmental Sagittal Diameter of the Cervical Spinal Canal in Patients with Cervical Spondylosis , 1983, Spine.

[104]  J. Turner,et al.  Natural History and Prognosis of Cervical Spondylosis , 1963, British medical journal.

[105]  P. K. Robinson,et al.  Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. , 1956, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[106]  A. D’Oro,et al.  Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases , 2017, Spine.

[107]  A. Vedantam,et al.  Does the type of T2-weighted hyperintensity influence surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A review , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[108]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Evaluation of corticospinal excitability in cervical myelopathy, before and after surgery, with transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot study , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[109]  H. Miyamoto,et al.  Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[110]  James D. Kang,et al.  Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in nonmyelopathic patients--a review of 1,039 cases. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[111]  J. Bednařík,et al.  Spondylotic cervical myelopathy: three aspects of the problem. , 2000, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[112]  D. Jaskólski,et al.  Pre- and postoperative motor conduction times, measured using magnetic stimulation, in patients with cervical spondylosis. , 1990, British journal of neurosurgery.

[113]  S. Nurick.  The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[114]  S. Nurjck.  The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. , 1972 .