An imbalanced development of coal and electricity industries in China

China's coal and electricity industries have a strong reliance on each other, however, because of excessive invasion of government, it is difficult for these two industries to form a stable, reasonable, and transaction cost-saving relationships, but long-run disputes and quarrels. This paper discusses the pricing policies and transaction relationship between these two industries from the historical perspective. It begins with the discussion of coal. Coal market has become competitive since 1980 due to the system of dual track approach, but coal sold to electricity was still tightly controlled by government-guided pricing. Then the paper examines electricity investment and tariff reform. Unlike coal, entry to electricity generation sector was gradually relaxed but generation and retailing tariffs are still strictly regulated. As energy demand and prices soared after 2002, coal and electricity enterprises are all unsatisfied with the rule of price setting of coal sold to electricity industry. This paper concludes that the deliberate low coal price policy does protect electricity industry from fuel cost fluctuation but harm coal industry. Allocative and productive efficiency are difficult to achieve in the long run.

[1]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[2]  Lawrence J. Lau,et al.  Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual‐Track Approach to Transition , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Elspeth Thomson,et al.  Reforming China's Coal Industry , 1996, The China Quarterly.

[4]  P. Joskow.  Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets , 1987 .

[5]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Price Adjustment in Long-Term Contracts: The Case of Coal , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Performance of Long-Term Contracts: Further Evidence from Coal Markets , 1990 .

[7]  Barry J. Naughton,et al.  Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978-1993 , 1995 .

[8]  Allen Blackman,et al.  Foreign direct investment in China's power sector : trends, benefits and barriers , 1999 .

[9]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[10]  O. Williamson.  The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[11]  Tatsu Kambara,et al.  The Energy Situation in China , 1992, The China Quarterly.

[12]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China's Industrial Sector in the 1990s? The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change , 2003 .

[13]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  China's Energy and Resource Uses: Continuity and Change , 1998, The China Quarterly.

[14]  Jonathan E. Sinton,et al.  What goes up: recent trends in China's energy consumption , 2000 .

[15]  Ming Yang,et al.  China's power management , 1996 .

[16]  Shao Shiwei Lu Zhengyong Berrah,et al.  China: Power Sector Regulation in a Socialist Market Economy , 1997 .

[17]  Lei Shen,et al.  The regulation of China’s township and village coal mines: a study of complexity and ineffectiveness , 2003 .

[18]  Wenying Chen,et al.  The reform of electricity power sector in the PR of China , 2006 .

[19]  Stephen Dow,et al.  Reform of China's electric power industry Challenges facing the government , 2000 .

[20]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  Deregulation and Growth in China's Energy Sector , 2003 .