Patient Specific Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Systems

Goal: The development of increasingly sophisticated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts calls for test beds that can reproduce an ever larger range of physiologic and pathophysiologic behaviors. In particular, upcoming smart and active devices will require extensive testing under complex dynamic conditions. Herein, we describe a test bed that allows for fast, cost effective, and realistic in vitro testing of active and passive, gravitational and nongravitational CSF shunts based on the hardware-in-the-loop principle. Methods: The shunt to be tested is placed in a dynamic in vitro setup that interfaces with a mathematical model of the patient's relevant physiology, which is evaluated numerically in real time. The model parameters can be identified using standard clinical tests. The test bed accounts for posture-dependent behavior and viscoelastic effects. Results: Simulations of infusion tests, of intracranial pressure modulation by cardiovascular action, and of the effects of postural changes show good agreement with published results. Evaluation of valves without and with gravitational units show in modeled sitting patients the expected behavior of overdrainage and avoidance thereof, respectively. Finally, a 24-h test cycle based on recorded patient data elucidates the interaction between patient and shunt system expressed by drainage rate and intracranial pressure during typical daily activities. Conclusion: We envision this test bed as a tool to quantify a shunt's performance within a realistic yet reproducible testing environment. Significance: The test bed can improve our understanding of the complex interaction between patient and shunt system and may catalyze the development of active shunts, while reducing the number of necessary in vivo experiments.

[1]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain. , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[2]  David A Steinman,et al.  Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[3]  A. Eklund,et al.  Intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus: impact of shunt adjustments and body positions , 2014, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[4]  Paul Kremer,et al.  The scientific history of hydrocephalus and its treatment , 1999, Neurosurgical Review.

[5]  M. Samii,et al.  Application of clinically recorded ICP patterns – an extension of conventional shunt testing , 2000, Child's Nervous System.

[6]  Rolf Ernst,et al.  Codesign of Embedded Systems: Status and Trends , 1998, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[7]  B. Matthews,et al.  Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  A. Marmarou,et al.  A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. , 1978, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  V. Rohde,et al.  In vitro performance and principles of anti-siphoning devices , 2014, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  J. D. Burton,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Valve Shunts Used in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus , 1973 .

[11]  S. Browd,et al.  Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. , 2006, Pediatric neurology.

[12]  A. Brodbelt,et al.  CSF pathways: a review , 2007, British journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  S. Browd,et al.  Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: Obstruction and mechanical failure. , 2006, Pediatric neurology.

[14]  J. Galicich,et al.  Formation and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in man. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Marek Czosnyka,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Scott A Stevens,et al.  Modeling steady-state intracranial pressures in supine, head-down tilt and microgravity conditions. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  O. Kempski,et al.  A nonlinear biomechanical model for evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt systems , 1994, Child's Nervous System.

[18]  J. Löfgren,et al.  THE PRESSURE‐VOLUME CURVE OF THE CEREBROSPINAL FLUID SPACE IN DOGS , 1973, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[19]  J. Pickard,et al.  Laboratory Testing of Hydrocephalus Shunts – Conclusion of the U.K. Shunt Evaluation Programme , 2002, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  D. de Zélicourt,et al.  Assessment of intracranial dynamics in hydrocephalus: effects of viscoelasticity on the outcome of infusion tests. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  Nina Sundström,et al.  Postural effects on intracranial pressure: modeling and clinical evaluation. , 2013, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for the design and testing of engine-control systems , 1998 .

[23]  Thomas H. Milhoral Posture-related Overdrainage: Comparison of the Performance of 10 Hydrocephalus Shunts in Vitro , 1998 .

[24]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  A Novel Interface for Hybrid Mock Circulations to Evaluate Ventricular Assist Devices , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  J. Drake,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up Data from the Shunt Design Trial , 2000, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[26]  Wayne W. Wakeland,et al.  A review of physiological simulation models of intracranial pressure dynamics , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[27]  A. Eklund,et al.  The pulsatility curve—the relationship between mean intracranial pressure and pulsation amplitude , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[28]  Vartan Kurtcuoglu,et al.  Craniospinal Pressure–Volume Dynamics in Phantom Models , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  S. Browd,et al.  New and improved ways to treat hydrocephalus: Pursuit of a smart shunt , 2013, Surgical neurology international.

[30]  S Leonhardt,et al.  Simulation of existing and future electromechanical shunt valves in combination with a model for brain fluid dynamics. , 2012, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[31]  Vartan Kurtcuoglu,et al.  Phantom Model of Physiologic Intracranial Pressure and Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  A. Eklund,et al.  Are intracranial pressure wave amplitudes measurable through lumbar puncture? , 2013, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[33]  F. Al-Muhanna,et al.  INTRAPERITONEAL PRESSURE AND INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE: ARE THEY THE SAME? , 2011, Peritoneal Dialysis International.

[34]  V. Gurfinkel,et al.  The sit-up: complex kinematics and muscle activity in voluntary axial movement. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  K. Laksari,et al.  Constitutive model for brain tissue under finite compression. , 2012, Journal of Biomechanics.

[36]  V. Knobloch,et al.  Flow induced by ependymal cilia dominates near-wall cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lateral ventricles , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  S. A. Stevens,et al.  Local Compliance Effects on the Global Pressure-Volume Relationship in Models of Intracranial Pressure Dynamics , 2000 .

[38]  K. Cieslicki,et al.  Hydrocephalus shunts and waves of intracranial pressure , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[39]  Michel André,et al.  The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  J D Pickard,et al.  How does CSF dynamics change after shunting? , 2008, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[41]  R. D. Adams,et al.  SYMPTOMATIC OCCULT HYDROCEPHALUS WITH "NORMAL" CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE.A TREATABLE SYNDROME. , 1965, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  O. Eichhorn [Physiology of cerebrospinal fluid]. , 1957, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[43]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Case study of relevant pressures for an implanted hydrocephalus valve in everyday life , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[44]  C. Benesch,et al.  Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices. , 1995, Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[45]  Scott A. Stevens,et al.  A whole-body mathematical model for intracranial pressure dynamics , 2003, Journal of mathematical biology.

[46]  Modeling of CSF dynamics: legacy of Professor Anthony Marmarou. , 2012, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[47]  Westgate Road,et al.  Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance , 2007 .

[48]  P. Eide,et al.  Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2008, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[49]  Harold L Rekate,et al.  The definition and classification of hydrocephalus: a personal recommendation to stimulate debate , 2008, Cerebrospinal Fluid Research.