Pheromone-modulated optomotor response in male gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar L.: Upwind flight in a pheromone plume in different wind velocities

Summary1.Lymantria dispar males flying in a wind tunnel, up a plume of female sex pheromone, respond to increasing wind velocity by steering a course more precisely upwind. Even though the course angles steered are distributed unimodally about zero degrees (0°), the resulting track angles maintain a remarkably consistent bimodal distribution across all wind velocities tested (Fig. 4).2.As the wind velocity increased, the moths maintained their average track angle and ground speed at fairly constant values (Figs. 2, 3). The males actively maintained these ‘preferred’ track angles and ground speeds by varying their air speed (Fig. 2) and course angles steered (Fig. 3).3.The longitudinal component of image flow, the signal which hypothetically controls ground speed, remained relatively constant across all wind velocities (Fig. 5). The transverse component of image flow, which presumably controls steering increased significantly as the wind velocity increased (Fig. 5). There was no constant relationship between the transverse and longitudinal components of image flow; they appear to be used independently to control flight.4.The males maintained the temporal aspects of their zigzagging flight tracks with remarkable consistency (Table 1). The duration between turns remained nearly the same across all wind velocities, lending support to a hypothetical CNS counterturning generator.

[1]  T. Collett,et al.  Binocular, Directionally Selective Neurones, Possibly Involved in the Optomotor Response of Insects , 1966, Nature.

[2]  M. Beroza,et al.  Potent Sex Attractant of the Gypsy Moth: Its Isolation, Identification, and Synthesis , 1970, Science.

[3]  S. R. Farkas,et al.  Chemical Trail-Following by Flying Insects: A Mechanism for Orientation to a Distant Odor Source , 1972, Science.

[4]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Pheromone-Regulated Anemotaxis in Flying Moths , 1974, Science.

[5]  T. Baker,et al.  Attractancy of Optically Active Pheromone for Male Gypsy Moths , 1977 .

[6]  A. Ludlow,et al.  An analysis of anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone , 1978 .

[7]  Ring T. Cardé,et al.  Behavioral Responses of the Gypsy Moth in a Wind Tunnel to Air-Borne Enantiomers of Disparlure , 1979 .

[8]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Guidance system used in moth sex attraction , 1980, Nature.

[9]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone , 1981 .

[10]  Michael L. McManus,et al.  The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management , 1981 .

[11]  J. Murlis,et al.  Fine‐scale structure of odour plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources , 1981 .

[12]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  The effects of pheromone concentration on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta , 1982 .

[13]  T. Baker,et al.  Pheromone Source Location by Flying Moths: A Supplementary Non-Anemotactic Mechanism , 1982, Science.

[14]  C. David,et al.  Competition between fixed and moving stripes in the control of orientation by flying Drosophila , 1982 .

[15]  THE ORGANIZATION OF FLIGHT MOTONEURONES IN THE MOTH, MANDUCA SEXTA , 1983 .

[16]  A. Ludlow,et al.  Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field , 1983, Nature.

[17]  J. Kennedy Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review , 1983 .

[18]  R. Preiss,et al.  Stabilization of altitude and speed in tethered flying gypsy moth males: influence of (+) and (‐)‐disparlure , 1983 .

[19]  T. Baker,et al.  Optomotor anemotaxis polarizes self‐steered zigzagging in flying moths , 1984 .

[20]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta , 1984 .

[21]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology , 1985 .

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths , 1985 .

[23]  T. Baker,et al.  Manoeuvres used by flying male oriental fruit moths to relocate a sex pheromone plume in an experimentally shifted wind‐field , 1987 .

[24]  T. Baker,et al.  COMPARISON OF MANOEUVRES USED BY WALKING VERSUS FLYING GRAPHOLITA MOLESTA MALES DURING PHEROMONE-MEDIATED UPWIND MOVEMENT , 1987 .

[25]  T. Baker,et al.  Adaptation of antennal neurons in moths is associated with cessation of pheromone-mediated upwind flight. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Field and laboratory electroantennographic measurements of pheromone plume structure correlated with oriental fruit moth behaviour , 1989 .

[27]  R. D. Collins,et al.  Influence of pheromone concentration and ambient temperature on flight of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L), in a sustained‐flight wind tunnel , 1993 .

[28]  J. Kennedy,et al.  The steering of zigzagging flight by male gypsy moths , 1987, Naturwissenschaften.

[29]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Pheromone-modulated optomotor response in male gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar L.: Directionally selective visual interneurons in the ventral nerve cord , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  E. Kramer,et al.  Mechanism of pheromone orientation in flying moths , 1986, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  T. Baker,et al.  Behavioral responses of maleHeliothis virescens in a sustained-flight tunnel to combinations of seven compounds identified from female sex pheromone glands , 1983, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[32]  T. Baker,et al.  Effects of varying sex pheromone component ratios on the zigzagging flight movements of the oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta , 1988, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[33]  PHEROMONES AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOR , 2005 .