Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: A preliminary study.

Electrical impedance spectroscopy has been investigated with but limited success as an adjunct procedure to mammography and as a possible pre-screening tool to stratify risk for having or developing breast cancer in younger women. In this study, the authors explored a new resonance frequency based [resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy (REIS)] approach to identify breasts that may have highly suspicious abnormalities that had been recommended for biopsies. The authors assembled a prototype REIS system generating multifrequency electrical sweeps ranging from 100 to 4100 kHz every 12 s. Using only two probes, one in contact with the nipple and the other with the outer breast skin surface 60 mm away, a paired transmission signal detection system is generated. The authors recruited 150 women between 30 and 50 years old to participate in this study. REIS measurements were performed on both breasts. Of these women 58 had been scheduled for a breast biopsy and 13 had been recalled for additional imaging procedures due to suspicious findings. The remaining 79 women had negative screening examinations. Eight REIS output signals at and around the resonance frequency were computed for each breast and the subtracted signals between the left and right breasts were used in a simple jackknifing method to select an optimal feature set to be inputted into a multi-feature based artificial neural network (ANN) that aims to predict whether a woman's breast had been determined as abnormal (warranting a biopsy) or not. The classification performance was evaluated using a leave-one-case-out method and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The study shows that REIS examination is easy to perform, short in duration, and acceptable to all participants in terms of comfort level and there is no indication of sensation of an electrical current during the measurements. Six REIS difference features were selected as input signals to the ANN. The area under the ROC curve (Az) was 0.707±0.033 for classifying between biopsy cases and non-biopsy (including recalled and screening negative) and the performance (Az) increased to 0.746±0.033 after excluding recalled but negative cases. At 95% specificity, the sensitivity levels were approximately 20.5% and 30.4% in the two data sets tested. The results suggest that differences in REIS signals between two breasts measured in and around the tissue resonance frequency can be used to identify at least some of the women with suspicious abnormalities warranting biopsy with high specificity.

[1]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[2]  T. Boehm,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results , 2000, European Radiology.

[3]  Daniel F Chen,et al.  Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[4]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Joan Leach,et al.  Expert heads a'rolling Melissa Leach Ian , 2005, The Lancet.

[6]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Qiang Li,et al.  Reduction of bias and variance for evaluation of computer-aided diagnostic schemes. , 2006, Medical physics.

[8]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical imaging results in 26 subjects , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  D. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  Alexander Hartov,et al.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  W. Thompson,et al.  The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer , 1996, Cancer.

[13]  R. Smith,et al.  Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: A current assessment of the issues , 2000, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  David Gur,et al.  Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  David Gur,et al.  Impedance measurements for early detection of breast cancer in younger women: a preliminary assessment , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2003 , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  David Gur,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[20]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[21]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[23]  Sarah Lenington,et al.  Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.