Decreasing the uncertainty of classical laser flash analysis using numerical algorithms robust to noise and systematic errors.

The laser flash method is highly regarded due to its applicability to a wide temperature range, from cryogenic temperatures to the melting point of refractory metals, and to extreme environments involving radioactive or hazardous materials. Although instruments implementing this method are mostly produced on a commercial basis by major manufacturers, there is always room for improvement both in terms of experimental methods and data treatment procedures. The measurement noise, either due to the detector performance or electromagnetic interferences, presents a significant problem when accurate determination of thermal properties is desired. Noise resilience of the laser flash method is rarely mentioned in the published literature; there are currently no data treatment procedures that could guarantee adequate performance under any operating conditions. In this paper, a computational framework combining finite-difference solutions of the heat conduction problem with nonlinear optimization techniques based on the use of quasi-Newton direction search and stochastic linear search with the Wolfe conditions is presented. The application of this framework to data with varying level of noise is considered. Finally, cross-verification and validation using an external standard, a commercial, and an in-house built laser flash instrument are presented. The open-source software implementing the described computational method is benchmarked against its industrial counterpart.

[1]  T. Log,et al.  Using non-linear χ2 fit in flash method , 1995 .

[2]  A. Lunev,et al.  Probing the correlation between phase evolution and growth kinetics in the oxide layers of tungsten using Raman spectroscopy and EBSD , 2020 .

[3]  D. Papaioannou,et al.  On the thermal conductivity of UO2 nuclear fuel at a high burn-up of around 100 MWd/kgHM , 2006 .

[4]  A. Degiovanni,et al.  A centered hot plate method for measurement of thermal properties of thin insulating materials , 2010 .

[5]  Jürgen Blumm,et al.  Characterization of the thermophysical properties of molten plymers and liquids using the flash technique , 2003 .

[6]  New method for determining the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity coefficient of dielectrics in a pulse experiment , 2010 .

[7]  Yoichi Takahashi,et al.  Novel finite pulse‐width correction in flash thermal diffusivity measurement , 1981 .

[8]  J. Warren,et al.  Comment on ‘‘Analysis for determining thermal diffusivity from thermal pulse experiments’’ , 1995 .

[9]  Finite pulse time effects in flash diffusivity measurements , 1993 .

[10]  B. Hay,et al.  New Apparatus for Thermal Diffusivity and Specific Heat Measurements at Very High Temperature , 2006 .

[11]  D. Halton,et al.  ADVANCES IN THE USE OF LASER-FLASH TECHNIQUES FOR THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY MEASUREMENT , 1998 .

[12]  E. Carr Rear-surface integral method for calculating thermal diffusivity from laser flash experiments , 2018, Chemical Engineering Science.

[13]  David Salmon,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Thermal conductivity of insulations using guarded hot plates, including recent developments and sources of reference materials , 2001 .

[14]  Rear-surface integral method for calculating thermal diffusivity: Finite pulse time correction and two-layer samples , 2019, 1904.02891.

[15]  M. Wenman,et al.  High temperature measurements and condensed matter analysis of the thermo-physical properties of ThO2 , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  R. Dinwiddie,et al.  Reliability of laser flash thermal diffusivity measurements of the thermal barrier coatings , 2000 .

[17]  M. Musella,et al.  A Universal Laser-Pulse Apparatus for Thermophysical Measurements in Refractory Materials at Very High Temperatures , 1999 .

[18]  Robert D. Cowan,et al.  Pulse Method of Measuring Thermal Diffusivity at High Temperatures , 1961 .

[19]  M. N. Khan,et al.  Transient hot-strip method for simultaneously measuring thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of solids and fluids , 1979 .

[20]  M. Laurent,et al.  New logarithmic technique in the flash method , 1997 .

[21]  E. Astm Standard test method for thermal diffusivity of solids by the flash method , 1992 .

[22]  P. Wolfe Convergence Conditions for Ascent Methods. II: Some Corrections , 1971 .

[23]  J. Blumm,et al.  Improvement of the mathematical modeling of flash measurements , 2002 .

[24]  B. Hay,et al.  A New Guarded Hot Plate Designed for Thermal-Conductivity Measurements at High Temperature , 2015 .

[25]  R. Taylor,et al.  Radiation loss in the flash method for thermal diffusivity , 1975 .

[26]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Thermal diffusivity of tungsten irradiated with protons up to 5.8 dpa , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Materials.

[27]  Hiroshi Kawamura,et al.  Thermal conductivity of neutron irradiated Be12Ti , 2003 .

[28]  K. B. Larson,et al.  Correction for Finite‐Pulse‐Time Effects in Very Thin Samples using the Flash Method of Measuring Thermal Diffusivity , 1967 .

[29]  R. Heckman Finite pulse‐time and heat‐loss effects in pulse thermal diffusivity measurements , 1973 .

[30]  T. Baba,et al.  Improvement of the laser flash method to reduce uncertainty in thermal diffusivity measurements , 2001 .

[31]  M. Wenman,et al.  A new numerical method and modified apparatus for the simultaneous evaluation of thermo-physical properties above 1500 K: A case study on isostatically pressed graphite , 2017 .

[32]  C. Cyron,et al.  The accuracy of laser flash analysis explored by finite element method and numerical fitting , 2019, Heat and Mass Transfer.

[33]  R. J. Jenkins,et al.  Flash Method of Determining Thermal Diffusivity, Heat Capacity, and Thermal Conductivity , 1961 .

[34]  J. A. Cape,et al.  Temperature and Finite Pulse‐Time Effects in the Flash Method for Measuring Thermal Diffusivity , 1963 .