Predicting the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances on marine populations

Marine ecosystems are increasingly exposed to anthropogenic disturbances that cause animals to change behavior and move away from potential foraging grounds. Here we present a process‐based modeling framework for assessing population consequences of such sub‐lethal behavioral effects. It builds directly on how disturbances influence animal movements, foraging and energetics, and is therefore applicable to a wide range of species. To demonstrate the model we assess the impact of wind farm construction noise on the North Sea harbor porpoise population. Subsequently, we demonstrate how the model can be used to minimize population impacts of disturbances through spatial planning. Population models that build on the fundamental processes that determine animal fitness have a high predictive power in novel environments, making them ideal for marine management.

[1]  I. Davies,et al.  A simulation model coupling the behaviour and energetics of a breeding central place forager to assess the impact of environmental changes , 2014 .

[2]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  K. Casey,et al.  Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world's ocean , 2015, Nature Communications.

[4]  Rebecca L. Lewison,et al.  Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna , 2004 .

[5]  Sara M. Maxwell,et al.  Foraging Behavior and Success of a Mesopelagic Predator in the Northeast Pacific Ocean: Insights from a Data-Rich Species, the Northern Elephant Seal , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  A. Frankel,et al.  A New Context‐Based Approach to Assess Marine Mammal Behavioral Responses to Anthropogenic Sounds , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Horst Bornemann,et al.  All at sea with animal tracks; methodological and analytical solutions for the resolution of movement , 2007 .

[8]  P. Tyack,et al.  Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise , 2007 .

[9]  V. Bartolino,et al.  Predicting the population-level impact of mitigating harbor porpoise bycatch with pingers and time-area fishing closures , 2017 .

[10]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Kate L. Brookes,et al.  Echolocation detections and digital video surveys provide reliable estimates of the relative density of harbour porpoises , 2016 .

[12]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Stochastic modelling of animal movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  C. Lockyer Harbour porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena ) in the North Atlantic: Biological parameters , 2013 .

[14]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach , 2014 .

[15]  R. Sibly,et al.  Effects of noise and by-catch on a Danish harbour porpoise population , 2014 .

[16]  U. Siebert,et al.  Seasonal habitat-based density models for a marine top predator, the harbor porpoise, in a dynamic environment , 2016 .

[17]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[18]  A. M. Benda-Beckmann,et al.  First indications that northern bottlenose whales are sensitive to behavioural disturbance from anthropogenic noise , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[19]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Predictive systems ecology , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  U. Siebert,et al.  Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany , 2013 .

[21]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena (L.)). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Read Age at Sexual Maturity and Pregnancy Rates of Harbour Porpoises Phocoena phocoena from the Bay of Fundy , 1990 .

[24]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[25]  P. Turchin Quantitative Analysis Of Movement , 1998 .

[26]  R. Sibly,et al.  Representing the acquisition and use of energy by individuals in agent‐based models of animal populations , 2013 .

[27]  Deborah Austin,et al.  Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator , 2004 .

[28]  Lars Bejder,et al.  Decline in Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins Exposed to Long‐Term Disturbance , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. , 2008, Ecology.

[30]  Bernd Würsig,et al.  Influences of man‐made noise and other human actions on cetacean behaviour , 1997 .

[31]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Making predictive ecology more relevant to policy makers and practitioners , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management , 2013 .

[33]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  Implications for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment , 2008 .

[34]  Uta Berger,et al.  Structural realism, emergence, and predictions in next-generation ecological modelling: Synthesis from a special issue , 2016 .

[35]  K. Betke,et al.  Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea , 2011 .

[36]  O. Berger‐Tal,et al.  Recursive movement patterns: review and synthesis across species , 2015 .

[37]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Super-individuals a simple solution for modelling large populations on an individual basis , 1995 .

[38]  Helen Bailey,et al.  Cumulative human impacts on marine predators , 2013, Nature Communications.

[39]  M. Mangel,et al.  A Dynamic State Model of Migratory Behavior and Physiology to Assess the Consequences of Environmental Variation and Anthropogenic Disturbance on Marine Vertebrates , 2017, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Steven F Railsback,et al.  Pattern-oriented modelling: a ‘multi-scope’ for predictive systems ecology , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and animal movement. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[43]  R. Martinez,et al.  Marine Noise Budgets in Practice , 2018 .

[44]  U. Siebert,et al.  Monitoring growth and energy utilisation of the harbour porpoise ( Phocoena phocoena ) in human care , 2013 .

[45]  A. Popper,et al.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  H. P. Tappan Of the sensitivity. , 1840 .

[47]  M. A. Fedak,et al.  Variations in behavior and condition of a Southern Ocean top predator in relation to in situ oceanographic conditions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Richard Condit,et al.  A Bioenergetics Approach to Understanding the Population Consequences of Disturbance: Elephant Seals as a Model System. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[49]  P. Miller,et al.  Marine seismic surveys and ocean noise: time for coordinated and prudent planning , 2015 .

[50]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  A. Read,et al.  LIFE IN THE FAST LANE: THE LIFE HISTORY OF HARBOR PORPOISES FROM THE GULF OF MAINE , 1995 .

[52]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Random walk models in biology , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[53]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Test of a behavior-based individual-based model: response of shorebird mortality to habitat loss. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[54]  I. Walkington,et al.  Predicting the impacts of wind farms on seabirds: An individual‐based model , 2018 .

[55]  P. Tyack,et al.  First direct measurements of behavioural responses by Cuvier's beaked whales to mid-frequency active sonar , 2013, Biology Letters.

[56]  Andreas Focks,et al.  Towards better modelling and decision support: Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE , 2014 .

[57]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[58]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Ultra-High Foraging Rates of Harbor Porpoises Make Them Vulnerable to Anthropogenic Disturbance , 2016, Current Biology.

[59]  C. Lockyer,et al.  Status, ecology and life history of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), in Danish waters , 2013 .

[60]  Simon Northridge,et al.  Bycatch of Marine Mammals in U.S. and Global Fisheries , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[61]  Uta Berger,et al.  Making Predictions in a Changing World: The Benefits of Individual-Based Ecology , 2014, Bioscience.

[62]  K. Macleod Atlas of cetacean distribution in North-West European waters, compiled and edited by James B. Reid, Peter G. H. Evans and Simon P. Northridge. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 2003, 76 pp. Price £17.00. , 2004 .

[63]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Incorporating output variance in local sensitivity analysis for stochastic models , 2008 .

[64]  Kate L. Brookes,et al.  Variation in harbour porpoise activity in response to seismic survey noise , 2014, Biology Letters.

[65]  W. Laurance,et al.  How Green is 'Green' Energy? , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[66]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances on marine populations , 2018 .

[67]  J. Teilmann,et al.  How a simple adaptive foraging strategy can lead to emergent home ranges and increased food intake , 2013 .

[68]  R. Kastelein,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Food Consumption, Respiration Rate, and Body Condition of a Male Harbor Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) , 2018 .

[69]  George Wittemyer,et al.  A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife , 2016, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[70]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Individual-based modelling of resource competition to predict density-dependent population dynamics: a case study with white storks , 2015 .

[71]  G. Huse Individual‐based Modeling and Ecology , 2008 .

[72]  Floris M. van Beest,et al.  Fine-scale movement responses of free-ranging harbour porpoises to capture, tagging and short-term noise pulses from a single airgun , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[73]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Noise Impacts on Wildlife: An Urgent Conservation Priority , 2013 .