End User Creativity: A Critical Realist Perspective

There has been a recent trend in the IS literature toward viewing IT systems less as material artifacts and more as imbricated, socio-technical assemblages. This suggests that greater attention must be paid to the detailed processes behind the interaction of users with systems. In this thesis, I explored the creative process that occurs when end users discover or develop novel and useful ways to appropriate IT systems. I used Eisenhardt (1989)’s framework for inducting theory from case studies, and conducted an embedded multiple-case study of users who have implemented creative ways to apply existing IT systems. I applied Critical Realist assumptions and employed theoretical lenses drawn from cognitive science (distributed cognition), cognitive psychology (dual-process theory) and Markus and Silver (2008)’s variant of Adaptive Structuration Theory (AST). I addressed the research question: What are the causal mechanisms that explain the creative appropriation of IT systems by end users? Using AST as a foundation, I developed a theoretical framework to represent the problem space that must be traversed by users making appropriation moves, which I have named Affordance Field Theory. I employed Narrative Networks (Pentland & Feldman, 2007) for my primary retroductive analysis, then re-analysed the data using Framework Matrices (Ritchie & Lewis, 2003). The complementary logical forms (processual and thematic, respectively) of the analytical tools provide empirical corroboration for the findings. I have derived a set of cognitive mechanisms that describe the information-processing operations involved in end user creativity. Using metaphors provided by distributed cognition, I have demonstrated how these mechanisms can be used to explain information processing at both the individual and collective levels. I have also developed an integrative model to explain how the mechanisms work together to explain creative action at the individual level. I have maintained my primary case study database in NVivo 10.

[1]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[2]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[3]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2013 .

[4]  Donald E. Wynn,et al.  Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2012, MIS Q..

[5]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Cognition Matters: Enduring Questions in Cognitive IS Research , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  K. Stanovich Rationality and the Reflective Mind , 2010 .

[7]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Associative processes in intuitive judgment , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Jörg Becker,et al.  The Concept of Creativity in the Information Systems Discipline: Past, Present, and Prospects , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[10]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[11]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Rob Procter,et al.  Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts , 2008 .

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[14]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[16]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[17]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[18]  M. Osman An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  J. George,et al.  Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence , 2003 .

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[21]  Sharon Bailin CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[22]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[25]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  (Un)Structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations , 1993, MIS Q..

[26]  William W. Gaver Technology affordances , 1991, CHI.

[27]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  A. Leslie Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." , 1987 .

[29]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[30]  R. Bhaskar A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[31]  Walter B. Weimer,et al.  Cognition and the symbolic processes , 1974 .