Relativistic atomic orbital contractions and expansions: magnitudes and explanations

The magnitude of the relativistic contraction or expansion of atomic orbitals is usually obtained by a comparison of the expectation values of r in a Dirac-Fock calculation and in a Hartree-Fock calculation. As, however, the Dirac Hamiltonian is implicitly given in a different picture from the non-relativistic Schrodinger Hamiltonian, the operator r does not correspond to the same physical quantity in the two cases. A proper definition of relativistic AO contraction/expansion should use the same physical quantity in both the relativistic and non-relativistic cases; for instance experiments with photons measure matrix elements of Pcharger which is represented by the operator r in the Dirac picture and by U,,rU&, in the Schrodinger picture ( U,, is the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation). Accordingly, the conventional values of the relativistic AO contraction consist of two contributions. One is due to the relativistic modification of the orbital; the other one is due to the different meanings of r in the Schrodinger and Dirac pictures. This latter difference turns out to be significant for Is AO, where it is 50%. The large relativistic contraction of valence s AO of heavy elements is investigated. Using perturbation theory or the resolution of the identity into projection operators, the orthogonality of the valence AO on the strongly contracted inner core orbitals is shown to have a slight valence-expanding effect, while mixing in of the higher continuum orbitals by the relativistic correction of the Hamiltonian is responsible for the overall contraction.

[1]  P. C. Schmidt,et al.  H. A. Bethe and E. Salpeter: Quantum Mechanics of One‐ and Two‐Electron atoms. Plenum/Rosetta, New York 1977. 370 Seiten, Preis: $ 8.95. , 1978 .

[2]  J. G. Snijders,et al.  The origin of relativistic effects of atomic orbitals , 1989 .

[3]  J. G. Snijders,et al.  Is the relativistic contraction of bond lengths an orbital-contraction effect? , 1980 .

[4]  Pekka Pyykkö,et al.  Relativistic Quantum Chemistry , 1978 .

[5]  A. S. Wightman,et al.  On the Localizability of Quantum Mechanical Systems , 1962 .

[6]  Ian P. Grant,et al.  RELATIVISTIC CALCULATION OF ATOMIC STRUCTURES. , 1970 .

[7]  V. Burke,et al.  The effect of relativity on atomic wave functions , 1967 .

[8]  B. Thaller,et al.  Remarks on the localization of Dirac particles , 1984 .

[9]  D. Mayers,et al.  Screening constants for relativistic wave functions , 1966, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  A. Barut,et al.  Position Operators and Localizability of Quantum Systems Described by Finite- and Infinite-Dimensional Wave Equations , 1968 .

[11]  S. Ruijsenaars On Newton-Wigner localization and superluminal propagation speeds , 1981 .

[12]  Ian P. Grant,et al.  An atomic multiconfigurational Dirac-Fock package , 1984 .

[13]  B. Thaller Potential scattering of Dirac particles , 1981 .

[14]  Tara Prasad Das,et al.  Relativistic quantum mechanics of electrons , 1973 .

[15]  L. Foldy,et al.  On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non-Relativistic Limit , 1950 .

[16]  S. Rose,et al.  The direct and indirect effects in the relativistic modification of atomic valence orbitals , 1978 .

[17]  Eugene P. Wigner,et al.  Localized States for Elementary Systems , 1949 .

[18]  H. Feshbach,et al.  Elementary Relativistic Wave Mechanics of Spin 0 and Spin 1/2 Particles , 1958 .

[19]  W. Kutzelnigg Perturbation theory of relativistic corrections , 1989 .

[20]  Z. Maksić,et al.  Theoretical Models of Chemical Bonding , 1991 .

[21]  J. Desclaux Relativistic Dirac-Fock expectation values for atoms with Z = 1 to Z = 120 , 1973 .