The economic regulation of railway networks: A worldwide survey

The rapid expansion of car use in the second half of the 20th century together with growing inefficiencies in the publicly run railways, led to traffic decline and financial difficulties for many railway companies. In order to face this situation, various structural reforms have been introduced which have increased the level of private sector involvement, strengthening the need of sound economic regulation. Starting from a desk survey, the paper reviews the resulting railways models for 20 countries. The main characteristics of each regulatory system have been collected and analyzed in order to provide an ex-ante overview of the current practices, both in quantitative and qualitative terms. Results show how public subjects still play a dominant role as infrastructure managers and frequently also as service providers in vertically integrated structures. Limited cases of privatization occurred. Our survey evidence how each country has developed its own framework according to its transport system, political context, economic situation, business and regulatory environment. Further researches are needed to study the ex-post performance of the industry providing empirical evidences of the impacts of the reforms.

[1]  David E. Tyrrall The UK Railway Privatisation: Failing to Succeed? , 2004 .

[2]  Chris Nash,et al.  Passenger railway reform in the last 20 years – European experience reconsidered , 2007 .

[3]  B. Landheer,et al.  European Conference of Ministers of Transport , 1966 .

[4]  Yang Jianxiang,et al.  China implements radical railway reform , 2013 .

[5]  José A. Gómez-Ibáñez,et al.  Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion , 2003 .

[6]  Chris Nash,et al.  Comparing Three Models for Introduction of Competition into Railways , 2011 .

[7]  E. Encyclopedia Canadian Transportation Agency , 2014 .

[8]  R. Pittman The freight railways of the former Soviet Union, twenty years on: Reforms lose steam , 2013 .

[9]  R. Pittman,et al.  Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Railways , 2001 .

[10]  Arne Jensen,et al.  Economic Impacts of Swedish Railway Deregulation: A Longitudinal Study , 2007 .

[11]  Y. Crozet,et al.  Beyond the “bundling vs unbundling” controversy: What is at stake for the French railway? , 2014 .

[12]  Louis S. Thompson,et al.  Developments in rail organization in the Americas, 1990 to present and future directions , 2012, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag..

[13]  Britain: Competition Undermined by Politics , 2006 .

[14]  C. Nash International Transport Forum , 2010 .

[15]  Heike Link,et al.  Unbundling, public infrastructure financing and access charge regulation in the German rail sector , 2012, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag..

[16]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .

[17]  Richard G. Sharp Results of Railway Privatization in Latin America , 2005 .

[18]  Regulation of State Owned Enterprises - Transnet Freight Rail Case Study , 2009 .

[19]  F. Calvo,et al.  Are rail charges connected to costs , 2012 .

[20]  Gunnar Alexandersson,et al.  Rail liberalisation in Sweden. Policy development in a European context , 2013 .

[21]  Giacomo Di Foggia,et al.  Competition and Pricing of Essential Inputs: The Case of Access Charges for the Use of the Italian Rail Infrastructure , 2013 .

[22]  F Mizutani,et al.  PRIVATIZATION OF THE JAPAN NATIONAL RAILWAY: OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE CHANGES. IN: RAILWAYS , 1997 .

[23]  Sanling Kim,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE COST STRUCTURE OF A SEOUL'S RAIL TRANSIT PROPERTY: A STOCASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 2001 .

[24]  John D. Bitzan,et al.  Railroad Costs and Competition: The Implications of Introducing Competition to Railroad Networks , 2003 .

[25]  Giacomo Di Foggia,et al.  Schemes and Levels of State Aid to Rail Industry in Europe: Evidences from a Cross-Country Comparison , 2013 .

[26]  G. D. Rus,et al.  A comparison of rail liberalisation levels across four European countries , 2012 .