The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination

Abstract Increasingly, scholars have been conducting team-based research with multinational collaborators to carry out internationally relevant studies, generate global impact, and promote academic exchanges. In this paper, we examine how four types of distance, i.e., geographic, political, cultural, and economic, relate to the output of international research collaborations. We analyze a bibliometric data set derived from four leading marketing journals spanning the 2001–2016 time frame. Among other insights, our results show that in the context of international collaborative research efforts, co-authors from countries with wider economic distances and narrower political distances have published fewer articles and received fewer citations compared to those from countries with narrower economic distances and wider political distances.

[1]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[2]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[3]  Michael R. Czinkota,et al.  International information cross‐fertilization in marketing ‐ An empirical assessment , 2000 .

[4]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[5]  R. Salomon,et al.  Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy , 2012 .

[6]  M. Polonsky,et al.  An Examination of the Globalisation of Authorship in Publishing in 20 Leading Marketing Journals , 2006 .

[7]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Shadows of the Past in International Cooperation: Collaboration Profiles of the Top Five Producers of Science , 2000, Scientometrics.

[8]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[9]  Yuko Fujigaki,et al.  The citation system: Citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation , 1998, Scientometrics.

[10]  Paul S. L. Yip,et al.  Economic distance and the survival of foreign direct investments , 2007 .

[11]  Ronald J. Bauerly,et al.  An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs , 2005 .

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Debora Shaw,et al.  A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  T. D. Stokes,et al.  Coauthorship, Social Structure and Influence Within Specialties , 1989 .

[15]  Anne-Marie Søderberg,et al.  Merging across borders:people, cultures and politics , 2003 .

[16]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[17]  Bastian Rake,et al.  Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: exploration of country-level determinants , 2014, Scientometrics.

[18]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Author affiliation in supply chain management and logistics journals: 2008‐2010 , 2012 .

[19]  Janne Tienari,et al.  Let’s Talk about “Us” , 2009 .

[20]  P. Ellis,et al.  How international are the international business journals , 2011 .

[21]  David S. Ackerman,et al.  In Search of Diversity: The Record of Major Marketing Journals , 1999 .

[22]  Philip Keefer,et al.  The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Rebecca Piekkari,et al.  Processes of International Collaboration in Management Research , 2013 .

[24]  B. Wooliscroft,et al.  How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing , 2006 .

[25]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany , 2010, Scientometrics.

[26]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.

[27]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.

[28]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[29]  Boonghee Yoo,et al.  Developing an Overall Ranking of 79 Marketing Journals: An Introduction of PRINQUAL to Marketing , 2009 .

[30]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[31]  P. Verhoef,et al.  Globalization of Authorship in the Marketing Discipline: Does It Help or Hinder the Field? , 2005 .

[32]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  International marketing journals : a preliminary regional and institutional examination of research productivity , 2006 .

[33]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[34]  Kyoji Fukao,et al.  The Impact of Host Countries' University Research and University-Industry Collaboration on the Location of Research and Development: Evidence from Japanese multinational firms , 2012 .

[35]  Asta Salmi,et al.  International research teams as analysts of industrial business networks , 2010 .

[36]  P. S. Nagpaul.  Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science , 2003, Scientometrics.

[37]  Anke Piepenbrink,et al.  The changing landscape of JIBS authorship , 2016 .

[38]  R. Salomon,et al.  Institutional Distance in International Business Research , 2010 .

[39]  Hung-Gay Fung,et al.  International Business Research: Coauthorship Patterns and Quality , 2008 .

[40]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Journal of Management on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association Journal and Article Identification Content Review Cultural Values Used Topics Studied Type I Studies—culture as Independent Variable Figure 1 Two Types of Cross-national, Cross-cultural Studies on Individuals and Teams in Organizati , 2022 .

[41]  Cheryl Nakata,et al.  Progress and promise: the last decade of international marketing research , 2005 .

[42]  B. Pierce,et al.  Publishing International Business Research: A Survey of Leading Journals , 1995 .

[43]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship , 1979, Scientometrics.

[44]  Mark F. Peterson,et al.  International collaboration in organizational behavior research , 2001 .

[45]  L. Lindgren.  If Robert Merton said it, it must be true: A citation analysis in the field of performance measurement , 2011 .

[46]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 1978, Scientometrics.

[47]  G. Hofstede.  Culture's Recent Consequences: Using Dimension Scores in Theory and Research , 2001 .

[48]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[49]  J. Choi,et al.  On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources , 2014 .

[50]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[51]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Laurent Jégou,et al.  The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics? , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[53]  Sujin Choi.  Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars?: international scientific collaboration among ‘advanced’ countries in the era of globalization , 2011, Scientometrics.

[54]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[55]  Bradley R. Barnes,et al.  Assessing the contribution of leading mainstream marketing journals to the international marketing discipline , 2010 .

[56]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[57]  Manuel Acosta,et al.  Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: the role of economic distance , 2011, Scientometrics.

[58]  Chenting Su,et al.  A review of research methodologies in international business , 2006 .

[59]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[60]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Guest Editorial from a Previous Editor-in-Chief: Twenty-Five Years of Electic Growth in Marketing Science , 2006 .

[61]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe , 2010 .

[62]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[63]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[64]  K. Subramanyam,et al.  Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review , 1983 .

[65]  A. Tsui,et al.  International Collaboration for Academic Publication , 2012 .

[66]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[67]  Lingyun Zhang,et al.  International academic impact of Chinese tourism research: A review based on the analysis of SSCI tourism articles from 2001 to 2012 , 2017 .

[68]  Hung-Gay Fung,et al.  International business research: Trends and school rankings , 2006 .

[69]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[70]  Bruce A. Blonigen,et al.  Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment , 2002 .

[71]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences , 2001 .

[72]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[73]  Mee-Jean Kim,et al.  Korean science and international collaboration, 1995-2000 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[74]  S. M. Lawani,et al.  Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[75]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[76]  Gary L. Frazier.  From the Incoming Editor , 2011 .

[77]  M. Bridgstock,et al.  The quality of single and multiple authored papers; An unresolved problem , 1991, Scientometrics.

[78]  M. Kwiek.  The Internationalization of Research in Europe , 2015 .

[79]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[80]  Ali Gazni,et al.  Globalization of national journals: investigating the growth of international authorship , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[81]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Knowledge and Information Sharing in Transnational Knowledge Networks: A Contextual Perspective , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[82]  Yan Yan,et al.  The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[83]  J. Sylvan Katz,et al.  Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.

[84]  William Goffman,et al.  Scientific information systems and the principle of selectivity , 1980 .

[85]  Michael R. Hyman,et al.  International marketing serials: a retrospective , 2001 .

[86]  Vesna Oluic-Vukovic,et al.  Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship , 1986, Scientometrics.

[87]  Tianwei He,et al.  International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries , 2009, Scientometrics.