Cost Effectiveness of Internet Interventions: Review and Recommendations

BackgroundInternet interventions have a large potential for public health impact, and their efficacy has been established over the past 10–15 years. Cost effectiveness of Internet interventions is one of the most frequently cited reasons for developing such treatments.PurposeThis paper provides a review of economic evaluations of Internet interventions with specific recommendations for future economic analyses of Internet interventions.MethodsA review of PubMed from 1995 through 2008 was conducted.ResultsWe identified eight studies that reported specific economic indicators associated with an Internet intervention, though many were lacking comprehensive analyses. Issues related to analysis perspective, included costs, type of analysis performed, and appropriate outcomes for Internet interventions are explored.ConclusionsThe lack of cost data published to date is likely a reflection of the early stage of research for many papers published during the review period. As the field now moves to effectiveness studies, it is important for cost-effectiveness data to be collected.

[1]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  R. Kessler,et al.  Impact of a Health Promotion Program on Employee Health Risks and Work Productivity , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[3]  Grant Blashki,et al.  Exploratory economic analyses of two primary care mental health projects: implications for sustainability , 2005, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Kathryn A. Phillips,et al.  Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation (second edition) , 2003 .

[5]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[6]  Áine McConnon,et al.  The Internet for weight control in an obese sample: results of a randomised controlled trial , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[7]  Heleen Riper,et al.  Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis , 2006, Psychological Medicine.

[8]  E. Blanchard,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based treatment for chronic headache. , 2005, Behaviour research and therapy.

[9]  M C Weinstein,et al.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[10]  Milton C. Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses , 1996 .

[11]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[12]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[14]  D. Wantland,et al.  The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  G. Andersson,et al.  A controlled trial of self-help treatment of recurrent headache conducted via the Internet. , 2000, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  W B Campbell,et al.  Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial). , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[17]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[18]  S. Grosse Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold , 2008, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[19]  M. Gold,et al.  Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. , 1996, Medical care.

[20]  P Sutcliffe,et al.  Health technology assessment. , 1986, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[21]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  Michael Horn,et al.  Outcomes of a Web-based patient education program for asthmatic children and adolescents. , 2006, Chest.

[23]  D. Southard,et al.  Clinical trial of an Internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. , 2003, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[24]  D. Tate,et al.  Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: population based study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Grazyna Adamiak,et al.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed , 2006 .

[26]  E. Murray,et al.  Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  C. Roelofs Prevention effectiveness: A guide to decision analysis and economic evaluation , 1997 .

[29]  Gerhard Andersson,et al.  Internet versus group cognitive-behavioral treatment of distress associated with tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Behavior therapy.