The Argus™ II retinal prosthesis: Factors affecting patient selection for implantation

The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis has been developed to provide partial restoration of vision to subjects blinded from outer retinal degenerative disease. To date, the device has been implanted in multiple subjects with profound retinitis pigmentosa as part of a worldwide clinical feasibility study (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00407602). The Argus II is intended to provide partial restoration of functional vision. Most subjects showed an improvement in tasks assessing orientation & mobility, spatial-motor localization, and ability of discerning the direction of motion of moving stimuli. Roughly one third of subjects experienced measurable improvement in visual acuity with the implant. Some subjects identified words with high accuracy, a result that has also been reported by the leading subretinal implant group. Perceptual threshold was correlated with electrode-retina distance, electrode-fovea distance, and light sensitivity, either as single variables or in bivariate linear regression. Taken together these three variables may be used to inform patient selection and develop algorithms for the fitting of higher-electrode count systems. Visual acuity for future generations of the Argus implant may not hit theoretical limitations until arrays hold an excess of several hundreds of electrodes. Nevertheless, preliminary safety and efficacy data are supportive of the development of higher-resolution systems that target macular placement from implant design and surgical perspectives.

[1]  M.S. Humayun,et al.  A Transcutaneous Data Telemetry System Tolerant to Power Telemetry Interference , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Ione Fine,et al.  Implanted Intraocular Retinal Prosthesis in Six Blind Subjects , 2005 .

[3]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visually guided performance of simple tasks using simulated prosthetic vision. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[4]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Detection of Motion by Blind Subjects With the Epiretinal 60-Electrode (Argus II) Retinal Prosthesis. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[5]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[6]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Birch,et al.  Psychophysical assessment of low visual function in patients with retinal degenerative diseases (RDDs) with the Diagnosys full-field stimulus threshold (D-FST) , 2009, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[8]  Gary Matthews,et al.  Functional Specialization of the Axon Initial Segment by Isoform-Specific Sodium Channel Targeting , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Crapper,et al.  RETINAL EXCITATION AND INHIBITION FROM DIRECT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. J. Roman,et al.  Quantifying rod photoreceptor-mediated vision in retinal degenerations: dark-adapted thresholds as outcome measures. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[12]  Avi Caspi,et al.  Feasibility study of a retinal prosthesis: spatial vision with a 16-electrode implant. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Migration of retinal cells through a perforated membrane: implications for a high-resolution prosthesis. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  H. Kaplan,et al.  Extracellular matrix ligands promote RPE attachment to inner Bruch’s membrane , 2002, Current eye research.

[17]  K. Rohrschneider Determination of the location of the fovea on the fundus. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  James Weiland,et al.  Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina. , 2006, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[19]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  M. Mcmahon,et al.  Retinal prosthesis phosphene shape analysis , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  A. M. Potts,et al.  The electrically evoked response (EER) of the visual system. II. Effect of adaptation and retinitis pigmentosa. , 1969, Investigative ophthalmology.

[22]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Ione Fine,et al.  Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation , 2010 .

[24]  M. Mladejovsky,et al.  ‘Braille’ reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation , 1976, Nature.

[25]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  B. Sellhaus,et al.  Implantation and explantation of a wireless epiretinal retina implant device: observations during the EPIRET3 prospective clinical trial. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  R. Shannon,et al.  Threshold-distance measures from electrical stimulation of human brainstem. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  T. Velte,et al.  A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[34]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  A. J. Roman,et al.  Inner retinal abnormalities in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa with RPGR mutations. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  A. J. Roman,et al.  Retinal laminar architecture in human retinitis pigmentosa caused by Rhodopsin gene mutations. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  H Karny,et al.  Clinical and physiological aspects of the cortical visual prosthesis. , 1975, Survey of ophthalmology.

[38]  W. Hauswirth,et al.  Treatment of leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: short-term results of a phase I trial. , 2008, Human gene therapy.

[39]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[40]  T. Wachtler,et al.  Stimulation with a wireless intraocular epiretinal implant elicits visual percepts in blind humans. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  R. Avery,et al.  Ranibizumab: treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2006, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[42]  W. Grill,et al.  Sites of neuronal excitation by epiretinal electrical stimulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[43]  A. J. Roman,et al.  Full-field stimulus testing (FST) to quantify visual perception in severely blind candidates for treatment trials , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[44]  Francesca Pennecchi,et al.  The expression of uncertainty in non-linear parameter estimation , 2006 .

[45]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[46]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Preliminary 6 month results from the argustm ii epiretinal prosthesis feasibility study , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[47]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  In vitro activation of retinal cells: estimating location of stimulated cell by using a mathematical model , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  Possible sources of neuroprotection following subretinal silicon chip implantation in RCS rats , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[50]  Srinivas R. Sadda,et al.  Electrical stimulation in normal and retinal degeneration (rd1) isolated mouse retina , 2006, Vision Research.

[51]  G. Brindley,et al.  The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  Thomas Euler,et al.  Functional Stability of Retinal Ganglion Cells after Degeneration-Induced Changes in Synaptic Input , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[54]  B. Jones,et al.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[55]  Joseph F. Rizzo,et al.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network , 2008, Vision Research.

[56]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Comparison of Electrical Stimulation Thresholds in Normal and Retinal Degenerated Mouse Retina , 2004, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[57]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[58]  E Zrenner,et al.  Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[59]  E. Strettoi,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells Survive and Maintain Normal Dendritic Morphology in a Mouse Model of Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Neuroprotective effect of transretinal electrical stimulation on neurons in the inner nuclear layer of the degenerated retina , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[61]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.

[62]  N Drasdo,et al.  Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye. , 1974, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[63]  Samip P. Shah,et al.  Electrical properties of retinal–electrode interface , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[64]  H. Kaplan,et al.  Reengineering of aged Bruch's membrane to enhance retinal pigment epithelium repopulation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[65]  C. Karwoski,et al.  Laminar profile of resistivity in frog retina. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  Bernard P Lepri Is acuity enough? Other considerations in clinical investigations of visual prostheses. , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[67]  J. D. Weiland,et al.  Resolution of the Epiretinal Prosthesis is not Limited by Electrode Size , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[68]  R. Lund,et al.  Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[69]  A. Edwards,et al.  Visual acuity impairment in patients with retinitis pigmentosa at age 45 years or older. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[70]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  High-Resolution Electrical Stimulation of Primate Retina for Epiretinal Implant Design , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[72]  Y. Tai,et al.  A Novel Approach for Subretinal Implantation of Ultrathin Substrates Containing Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium Monolayer , 2012, Ophthalmic Research.

[73]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  The Subretinal Microphotodiode Array Retinal Prosthesis , 1998, Ophthalmic Research.

[74]  K. Horch,et al.  Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system , 1992, Vision Research.

[75]  Arup Roy,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[76]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  M. Humayun,et al.  MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE MACULA IN EYES WITH DISCIFORM AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION , 2002, Retina.

[78]  C. Kufta,et al.  Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[79]  R. Massof,et al.  Foveal cone involvement in retinitis pigmentosa progression assessed through flash-on-flash parameters. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[80]  James D. Weiland,et al.  An In Vitro Model of a Retinal Prosthesis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[81]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  Loss of responses to visual but not electrical stimulation in ganglion cells of rats with severe photoreceptor degeneration. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[82]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Patients Blinded by Outer Retinal Dystrophies Are Able to Identify Letters Using the Argus TM II Retinal Prosthesis System , 2010 .