Feeding strategy, nitrogen cycling, and profitability of dairy farms.

On a typical dairy farm today, large amounts of N are imported as feed supplements and fertilizer. If this N is not recycled through crop growth, it can lead to large losses to the atmosphere and ground water. More efficient use of protein feed supplements can potentially reduce the import of N in feeds, excretion of N in manure, and losses to the environment. A simulation study with a dairy farm model (DAFOSYM) illustrated that more efficient feeding and use of protein supplements increased farm profit and reduced N loss from the farm. Compared to soybean meal as the sole protein supplement, use of soybean meal along with a less rumen degradable protein feed reduced volatile N loss by 13 to 34 kg/ha of cropland with a small reduction in N leaching loss (about 1 kg/ha). Using the more expensive but less degradable protein supplement along with soybean meal improved net return by $46 to $69/cow per year, dependent on other management strategies of the farm. Environmental and economic benefits from more efficient supplementation of protein were generally greater with more animals per unit of land, higher milk production, more sandy soils, or a daily manure hauling strategy. Relatively less benefit was obtained when either alfalfa or corn silage was the sole forage on the farm or when relatively high amounts of forage were used in animal rations.

[1]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[2]  S. Tamminga,et al.  Nutrition Management of Dairy Cows as a Contribution to Pollution Control , 1992 .

[3]  R. A. Nordstedt,et al.  Dietary Protein Effects on Nitrogen Excretion and Manure Characteristics of Lactating Cows , 1996 .

[4]  Timothy M. Harrigan,et al.  Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems , 1996 .

[5]  C. Alan Rotz,et al.  Alfalfa Drying Model for the Field Environment , 1985 .

[6]  L. R. Borton,et al.  Alfalfa and Corn Silage Systems Compared on Michigan Dairy Farms , 1997 .

[7]  C. A. Rotz,et al.  Loss Models for Forage Harvest , 1995 .

[8]  C. A. Rotz,et al.  Simulation of forage harvest and conservation on dairy farms , 1985 .

[9]  J. Wohlt,et al.  Dry Matter Intake, Milk Yield and Composition, and Nitrogen Use in Holstein Cows Fed Soybean, Fish, or Corn Gluten Meals , 1991 .

[10]  R. Boston,et al.  Managing Nitrogen on Dairy Farms: An Integrated Approach I. Model Description , 1996 .

[11]  H. L. Person,et al.  Simulation to evaluate dairy manure systems , 1995 .

[12]  James D. Ferguson,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis of Nitrogen Losses from Dairy Farms , 1997 .

[13]  M. VandeHaar Efficiency of nutrient use and relationship to profitability on dairy farms. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  C. Rotz,et al.  A Model of Alfalfa Hay Storage , 1989 .

[15]  J. Richter,et al.  Managing Nitrogen for groundwater quality and farm profitability , 1992 .

[16]  C. Alan Rotz,et al.  DAFOSYM: A Dairy Forage System Model for Evaluating Alternatives in Forage Conservation , 1989 .

[17]  D. Mertens,et al.  Prediction of excretion of manure and nitrogen by Holstein dairy cattle. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  S. Bacon,et al.  Plant nutrient flow in the managed pathways of an intensive dairy farm. , 1990 .

[19]  C. A. Rotz,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of Forage Changes in the Silo , 1989 .

[20]  W. Knoblauch,et al.  The Impact of Nutrient Loading Restrictions on Dairy Farm Profitability , 1995 .

[21]  L. Chase,et al.  Improving Dairy Farm Sustainability I: An Approach to Animal and Crop Nutrient Management Planning , 1998 .

[22]  D R Buckmaster,et al.  A dairy herd model for use in whole farm simulations. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.