Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains.

Study of the behavior of trabecular bone at strains below 0.40 percent is of clinical and biomechanical importance. The goal of this work was to characterize, with respect to anatomic site, loading mode, and apparent density, the subtle concave downward stress-strain nonlinearity, that has been observed recently for trabecular bone at these strains. Using protocols designed to minimize end-artifacts, 155 cylindrical cores from human vertebrae, proximal tibiae, proximal femora, and bovine proximal tibiae were mechanically tested to yield at 0.50 percent strain per second in tension or compression. The nonlinearity was quantified by the reduction in tangent modulus at 0.20 percent and 0.40 percent strain as compared to the initial modulus. For the pooled data, the mean +/- SD percentage reduction in tangent modulus at 0.20 percent strain was 9.07+/- 3.24 percent in compression and 13.8 +/- 4.79 percent in tension. At 0.40 percent strain, these values were 23.5 +/- 5.71 and 35.7+/- 7.10 percent, respectively. The magnitude of the nonlineari't depended on both anatomic site (p < 0.001) and loading mode (p < 0.001), and in tension was positively correlated with density. Calculated values of elastic modulus and yield properties depended on the strain range chosen to define modulus via a linear curve fit (p < 0.005). Mean percent differences in 0.20 percent offset yield strains were as large as 10.65 percent for some human sites. These results establish that trabecular bone exhibits nonlinearity at low strains, and that this behavior can confound intersite comparisons of mechanical properties. A nonlinear characterization of the small strain behavior of trabecular bone was introduced to characterize the initial stress-strain behavior more thoroughly.

[1]  R. Pidaparti,et al.  A uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaptation: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation? , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W C Hayes,et al.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A. Curnier,et al.  A 3D damage model for trabecular bone based on fabric tensors. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  C. Turner,et al.  Yield behavior of bovine cancellous bone. , 1989, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[8]  W C Hayes,et al.  Compressive creep behavior of bovine trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  H. Frost,et al.  Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. , 1992, Bone and mineral.

[11]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F. Linde,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.

[13]  W. Hayes,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  D B Burr,et al.  In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. , 1996, Bone.

[16]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Finite‐element modeling of trabecular bone: Comparison with mechanical testing and determination of tissue modulus , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Ivan Hvid,et al.  Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  D Vashishth,et al.  In vivo diffuse damage in human vertebral trabecular bone. , 2000, Bone.

[20]  W. Hayes,et al.  A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Stress relaxation behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Ghazi Abu-Farsakh,et al.  New material models for nonlinear stress-strain behaviour of composite materials , 1989 .

[26]  W. Hayes,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  F. Linde,et al.  Tensile and compressive properties of cancellous bone. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Mechanical behavior of human trabecular bone after overloading , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  T. McMahon,et al.  Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  F. Linde,et al.  The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  W C Hayes,et al.  Computed tomography‐based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  F. Linde,et al.  Stiffness behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Material properties of femoral cancellous bone in axial loading , 1980, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery. Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie.

[35]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[36]  H. S. Morgan,et al.  Analysis of Nonlinear Stress-Strain Behavior of Fiber-Reinf orced Composite Materials , 1977 .

[37]  Frank Linde,et al.  The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.