Image Velocity, Not Tau, Explains Arrival-Time Judgments From Global Optical Flow

The time-to-passage (TTP; i.e., the time) until an object passes an observer is optically specified by global tau, a variable that operates on the expansion rate of the angle subtended by an object relative to the observer's heading. M. K. Kaiser and L. Mowafy (1993) provided evidence for observers' sensitivity to global tau in a 3-D cloud of point lights. This interpretation is challenged, and it is suggested that TTP judgments are based on a related but much simpler variable, the image velocity of the object. The present study reexamined several factors that are relevant for the extraction of global tau. When global tau and image velocity were brought into conflict by varying the lateral offsets of the targets, observers showed a strong tendency to rely on the latter variable. Other factors that are supposed to affect TTP judgments only if observers relied on global tau, such as flow-field density and gazemovement angle, did not affect performance.

[1]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fields , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  B. Frost,et al.  Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons , 1992, Nature.

[4]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[5]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy , 1994, Perception.

[6]  E Brenner,et al.  Is Judging Time-to-Contact Based on ‘Tau’? , 1996, Perception.

[7]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[12]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Heuer,et al.  Estimates of Time to Contact Based on Changing Size and Changing Target Vergence , 1993, Perception.

[16]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[17]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[19]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[20]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Four Questions of Time to Contact: A Critical Examination of Research on Interceptive Timing , 1993, Perception.

[23]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perception with an eye for motion , 1986 .

[25]  James A. Caviness,et al.  Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming" , 1962, Science.

[26]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[28]  M. Kaiser,et al.  Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. , 1993 .

[29]  G. Kebeck,et al.  Optical magnification as event information , 1992, Psychological research.

[30]  W. Simpson,et al.  Depth Discrimination from Optic Flow , 1988, Perception.

[31]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.