Behaviour of organisms can occur in different types and complexities, varying from very simple behaviour to more sophisticated forms. Depending on the complexity of the externally observable behaviour, the internal mental representations and capabilities required to generate the behaviour also show a large variety in complexity. From an evolutionary viewpoint, for example, [1992] and [1871] point out how the development of behaviour relates to the development of more complex cognitive capabilities. [1996, p. 3] assumes a relationship between the complexity of the environment and the development of mental representations and capabilities. He formulates the main theme of his book in condensed form as follows: ‘The function of cognition is to enable the agent to deal with environmental complexity’ (the Environmental Complexity Thesis). In this paper, this thesis is refined as follows:
the more complex the environment, the more sophisticated is the behaviour required to deal with this environment,
the more sophisticated the behaviour, the more complex are the mental representations and capabilities needed
[1]
Peter Godfrey-Smith,et al.
Complexity and the function of mind in nature: Foundations
,
1996
.
[2]
D. Stephens.
Change, regularity, and value in the evolution of animal learning
,
1991
.
[3]
J. Graves.
The descent of man
,
2004,
Nature.
[4]
Elliott Sober,et al.
From a biological point of view: The adaptive advantage of learning and a priori prejudice
,
1994
.
[5]
Tibor Bosse,et al.
On the Complexity Monotonicity Thesis for Environment, Behaviour and Cognition
,
2007,
DALT.
[6]
Thomas T. Hills.
Animal Foraging and the Evolution of Goal-Directed Cognition
,
2006,
Cogn. Sci..
[7]
O. L. Tinklepaugh.
The multiple delayed reaction with chimpanzees and monkeys.
,
1932
.
[8]
Tibor Bosse,et al.
Specification and Verification of Dynamics in Cognitive Agent Models
,
2006,
2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.
[9]
Michael Taylor.
Diversity of life
,
1994,
Nature.