A new experimental wind tunnel facility for aerosol sampling investigations

Abstract A new experimental wind tunnel facility for aerosol sampling investigations has been built and its performance evaluated. Subsequently, an experimental methodology using a polydisperse test aerosol of glass beads to measure entry, transmission and overall sampling efficiencies has been developed and tested. The new facility is composed of a horizontal cylindrical pipe of 5 m long and 30 cm in diameter. The measurement zone is located just at the exit, allowing to take benefit of the whole cross-sectional area inside a stabilised aerosol flow. The working air velocity range is 0.5–4.5 m s−1 Air velocity and turbulence profiles are uniform within 10%. Turbulence in the working section is controlled with a square mesh grid. The test aerosol is generated by a fluidized-bed generator and dispersed into the clean air flow upstream of the horizontal part. Generated particles are within a size interval extending from a few μm to about 80 μm in aerodynamic diameter. Tests of time and space stability of the test aerosol in the working section were carried out. They have shown a reasonably uniform spatial distribution and time stability considering the size range of generated particles. The experimental method allows to obtain, simultaneously with the same technique entry, transmission, and overall sampling efficiencies of samplers from several μm up to 70 μm in particle aerodynamic diameter with a good accuracy. It is based on the measurement of the distribution of particle number concentration vs particle aerodynamic diameter of deposited and sampled aerosols in a reference probe and in the test sampler. To evaluate both the new wind tunnel facility and the methodology, measurements of the different efficiencies were achieved using a cylindrical sharp-edged thin-walled probe as a test sampler. This evaluation was performed in three steps. At first, the reproducibility of transmission efficiency measurements of the probe working in isokinetic conditions was determined. It appears fairly good between 10 and 70 μm in particle aerodynamic diameter. Then, the methodology was applied to the assessment of the aspiration efficiency of a probe working in subisokinetic conditions. Finally, a consistency test of the data was proposed and applied to our data; it consists in comparing the mass fractions of collected samples (deposited on the internal sampler walls, collected onto filters) calculated from the efficiency data and the distributions of particle concentrations, with those which are directly recovered after each experiment and weighed. This test yields an indicator of the quality of the whole efficiency data set.

[1]  J H Vincent,et al.  A new static sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. , 1985, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  J. Fabries,et al.  Equipment for the study of air sampling instruments with real time measurement of the aerosol concentration , 1984 .

[3]  D. B. Blackford,et al.  The design of an aerosol test tunnel for occupational hygiene investigations , 1986 .

[4]  M. Durham,et al.  Evaluation of aerosol aspiration efficiency as a function of stokes number, velocity ratio and nozzle angle , 1980 .

[5]  Hugh L. Dryden,et al.  A review of the statistical theory of turbulence. , 1943 .

[6]  Sergey A. Grinshpun,et al.  Secondary aspiration of aerosol particles into thin-walled nozzles facing the wind , 1988 .

[7]  L Armbruster,et al.  Investigations into defining inhalable dust. , 1982, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  T. Ogden,et al.  Wind effects on personal dust samplers , 1987 .

[9]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Dispersion characteristics of a fluidized bed , 1974 .

[10]  P. A. Tufto,et al.  Dependence of particulate sampling efficiency on inlet orientation and flow velocities , 1982 .

[11]  A. Mcfarland,et al.  Aerosol Deposition in Sampling Probes , 1992 .

[12]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  Aerosol sampling inlets and inhalable particles , 1981 .

[13]  James H. Vincent,et al.  Aerosol sampling : science and practice , 1989 .

[14]  J. H. Vincent,et al.  The Effects of Turbulence on the Entry of Airborne Particles into a Blunt Dust Sampler , 1985 .

[15]  K. Willeke,et al.  Generation of aerosols and facilities for exposure experiments , 1980 .

[16]  S. Corrsin,et al.  Simple Eulerian time correlation of full-and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, ‘isotropic’ turbulence , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  L. J. Purdue,et al.  Wind Tunnel Evaluation of PM10 Samplers , 1990 .

[18]  J. Guichard.  AEROSOL GENERATION USING FLUIDIZED BEDS , 1976 .

[19]  D. Mark,et al.  On the aspiration characteristics of large-diameter, thin-walled aerosol sampling probes at yaw orientations with respect to the wind , 1986 .

[20]  J. F. Fabries,et al.  Realization of a Dust Tunnel - Response of Some Air Sampling Instruments Used in Industrial Hygiene , 1980 .

[21]  K. Okazaki,et al.  Transmission and deposition behavior of aerosols in sampling inlets , 1987 .

[22]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[23]  J. B. Wedding,et al.  The wedding ambient aerosol sampling inlet (D50 = 10 μm) for the high-volume sampler , 1985 .

[24]  Mark D. Hoover,et al.  A method for producing non-spherical monodisperse particles using integrated circuit fabrication techniques , 1990 .

[25]  R. L. Carpenter,et al.  Electrostatic charge of aerosol particles from a fluidized bed aerosol generator , 1988 .

[26]  L. M. Levin,et al.  Techniques for collection of representative aerosol samples , 1974 .

[27]  R. W. Lines,et al.  The Electrical Sensing Zone Method (The Coulter Principle) , 1992 .

[28]  K. Willeke,et al.  Aspiration Efficiency: Unified Model for All Forward Sampling Angles , 1990 .

[29]  J H Vincent,et al.  Applications of blunt sampler theory to the definition and measurement of inhalable dust. , 1982, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  D. Dunn-Rankin,et al.  Low-cost wind tunnel for aerosol inhalation studies. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[31]  K. Okazaki,et al.  Influence of turbulence on aerosol sampling efficiency , 1988 .

[32]  Pengfei Gao,et al.  A Compact Wind Tunnel for Evaluating Aerosol Samplers , 1996 .

[33]  R. Clift,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles , 1978 .

[34]  P. Tsai,et al.  Impaction model for the aspiration efficiencies of aerosol samplers at large angles with respect to the wind , 1993 .

[35]  William C. Hinds,et al.  A Low Velocity Wind Tunnel to Evaluate Inhalability and Sampler Performance for Large Dust Particles , 1995 .