Economics, Ethics and Green Consumerism

Publisher Summary This chapter examines green consumerism and its implications for human welfare and the environment. The analysis begins with a simple model of rational choice to demonstrate that economics can yield insights into consumption that are not as simplistic as those built into many conventional model. The standard model of rational choice, and its expansion to take into consideration non-welfarist concerns for the environment, yields an optimistic view of green consumerism and its potential to deliver more sustainable consumption patterns. In essence, it contributes an overly optimistic understanding, according to which sensitizing consumers to environmental values and concerns, brings about a change of values to change the behavior. Models that recognize the interdependence of consumer choices substantiate the promise of green consumerism and strongly remind the fragility of the promise of green consumerism. These models also demonstrate that it maybe costly for consumers to change their consumption patterns may be costly. The public policy may expand opportunity sets and alter the relative costs and benefits of alternatives. The worrying aspect of green consumerism is its potential transformation into an elitist alternative lifestyle. Green consumerism may not deliver environmental benefits, although it could deliver moral satisfaction for the alternative minority.

[1]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters , 1999 .

[2]  M. Cogoy,et al.  The consumer as a social and environmental actor , 1999 .

[3]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[4]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity: Markets, Society, and Ecosystems , 1997 .

[5]  A. Sen,et al.  The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  A. Vatn,et al.  Choices without Prices without Apologies , 1994 .

[7]  J. Hicks,et al.  A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Part II. A Mathematical Theory of Individual Demand Functions , 1934 .

[8]  A. Sen,et al.  Behaviour and the concept of preference , 1971 .

[9]  R. Frank The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods , 1985 .

[10]  Brian Bishop,et al.  Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation , 1999 .

[11]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .

[12]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Consumption, sustainable welfare and human needs--with reference to UK expenditure patterns between 1954 and 1994 , 1999 .

[13]  A. Sen,et al.  Utility: Ideas and Terminology , 1991, Economics and Philosophy.

[14]  Susse Georg The Social Shaping of Household Consumption , 1999 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[16]  Giacomo Corneo,et al.  Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism , 1997 .

[17]  Gregory S. Kavka Is Individual Choice Less Problematic than Collective Choice? , 1991, Economics and Philosophy.

[18]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption , 1996 .

[19]  H. Leibenstein Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand , 1950 .

[20]  A. Sen,et al.  Environmental Evaluation and Social Choice: Contingent Valuation and the Market Analogy , 1995 .

[21]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[22]  I. Røpke The dynamics of willingness to consume , 1999 .

[23]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.