Bipolar II illness: course and outcome over a five-year period

Synopsis A five year semi-annual follow-up of patients with non-bipolar (N = 442), bipolar II (N = 64) and bipolar I (N = 53) major depression tracked the courses of prospectively observed major depressive, hypomanic and manic syndromes. In all three groups, depression was much more likely in any given week than was hypomania or mania. However, during the majority of weeks, no full syndrome was present and none of the groups exhibited evidence of continuing psychosocial deterioration. Though all three groups exhibited similar times to recovery from index and subsequent major depressive episodes, both bipolar groups had substantially higher relapse rates and developed more episodes of major depression, hypomania and mania. The two bipolar groups, in turn, differed by the severity of manic-like syndromes and thus remained diagnostically stable; the bipolar II patients were much less likely to develop full manic syndromes or to be hospitalized during follow-up. In conjunction with family study data showing that bipolar II disorder breeds true, these data support the separation of bipolar I and bipolar II affective disorder.

[1]  L. Tondo,et al.  Course of the Manic-Depressive Cycle and Changes Caused by Treatments , 1980, Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie.

[2]  N. Andreasen,et al.  The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  M. Lammel [The phenomenology of depression]. , 1987, Psychiatrie, Neurologie, und medizinische Psychologie.

[4]  N. Andreasen,et al.  The significance of past mania or hypomania in the course and outcome of major depression. , 1987, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  G. Klerman,et al.  Differential outcome of pure manic, mixed/cycling, and pure depressive episodes in patients with bipolar illness. , 1986, JAMA.

[6]  W. Coryell,et al.  Outcome in schizoaffective, psychotic, and nonpsychotic depression. Course during a six- to 24-month follow-up. , 1984, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  N. Andreasen,et al.  A Family Study of Bipolar II Disorder , 1984, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[8]  G. Klerman,et al.  "Double depression": two-year follow-up. , 1983, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  J. Ramos-Brieva,et al.  The course of manic-depressive illness. A comparative study of bipolar I and bipolar II patients. , 1982, Journal of affective disorders.

[10]  J. Endicott,et al.  A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[11]  E. Robins,et al.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  M. Leonard,et al.  Bipolar manic-depressive disorder: a reassessment of course and outcome. , 1977, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[13]  J. Fleiss,et al.  The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. , 1976, Archives of general psychiatry.

[14]  N. Andreasen,et al.  The phenomenology of depression , 1988 .

[15]  J. Angst The Course of Major Depression, Atypical Bipolar Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder , 1986 .

[16]  N. Andreasen,et al.  Bipolar II : Combine or keep separate? , 1985 .