Economic-based design of engineering systems with degrading components

Abstract The allocation of means and tolerances to provide quality and reliability is a challenge. Traditional measures include mean time to failure and its variance; however, they have some shortcomings. In this paper, a monetary measure based on present worth is invoked. The sum of the production cost and the expected loss of quality cost over time and rates are invoked. The cumulative distribution function for time-variant distributions due to degrading components is required. The proposed framework extends both classical reliability and methods that assume system degradation profiles. The design of an automobile overrun clutch shows the practicality and promise of the approach.

[1]  Jeffrey Alun Jones A toolkit for parametric drift modelling of electronic components , 1999 .

[2]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Optimal Mean and Tolerance Allocation Using Conformance-based Design , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  Dimitri V. Val,et al.  Effect of Different Limit States on Life-Cycle Cost of RC Structures in Corrosive Environment , 2005 .

[4]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Set theoretic formulation of performance reliability of multiple response time‐variant systems due to degradations in system components , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[5]  W. Nelson Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1998 .

[6]  M. A. Styblinski Formulation of the drift reliability optimization problem , 1991 .

[7]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Optimal design with probabilistic objective and constraints , 2006 .

[8]  L. F. Hauglund,et al.  Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection , 1990 .

[9]  Robert Spence,et al.  Tolerance Design of Electronic Circuits , 1997 .

[10]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Interrelating Quality and Reliability in Engineering Systems , 2002 .

[11]  Man-Hee Park,et al.  Optimal tolerance allocation with loss functions , 2000 .

[12]  Michael Havbro Faber Risk Based Structural Maintenance Planning , 1997 .

[13]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[14]  J. L. Hodges,et al.  The use of Previous Experience in Reaching Statistical Decisions , 1952 .

[15]  Alan Genz,et al.  Numerical computation of rectangular bivariate and trivariate normal and t probabilities , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[16]  Dongsu Ryu,et al.  Novel concepts for reliability technology , 2005, Microelectron. Reliab..

[17]  Chao-Yu Chou,et al.  On the present worth of multivariate quality loss , 2001 .

[18]  A.C. Brombacher,et al.  A method for reliability optimization through degradation analysis and robust design , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[19]  David B. Pratt,et al.  PRESENT WORTH OF EXTERNAL QUALITY LOSSES FOR SYMMETRIC NOMINAL-IS-BETTER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS , 1996 .

[20]  Wei Xue,et al.  Optimal Design of Roller One Way Clutch for Starter Drives , 2004 .

[21]  Fred Moses,et al.  Cost and safety optimization of structural design specifications , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Gordon J. Savage,et al.  Integrated robust design using probability of conformance metrics , 2002 .

[23]  Jon R. Mancuso,et al.  Mechanical power transmission components , 1994 .

[24]  Chao-Yu Chou,et al.  Bivariate tolerance design for lock wheels by considering quality loss , 2000 .

[25]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .