Bayesian segmentation of spatially resolved transcriptomics data

Spatial transcriptomics is an emerging stack of technologies, which adds spatial dimension to conventional single-cell RNA-sequencing. New protocols, based on in situ sequencing or multiplexed RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization register positions of single molecules in fixed tissue slices. Analysis of such data at the level of individual cells, however, requires accurate identification of cell boundaries. While many existing methods are able to approximate cell center positions using nuclei stains, current protocols do not report robust signal on the cell membranes, making accurate cell segmentation a key barrier for downstream analysis and interpretation of the data. To address this challenge, we developed a tool for Bayesian Segmentation of Spatial Transcriptomics Data (Baysor), which optimizes segmentation considering the likelihood of transcriptional composition, size and shape of the cell. The Bayesian approach can take into account nuclear or cytoplasm staining, however can also perform segmentation based on the detected transcripts alone. We show that Baysor segmentation can in some cases nearly double the number of the identified cells, while reducing contamination. Importantly, we demonstrate that Baysor performs well on data acquired using five different spatially-resolved protocols, making it a useful general tool for analysis of high-resolution spatial data.

[1]  Oliver Stegle,et al.  Benchmarking Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Protocols for Cell Atlas Projects , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  Nimrod D. Rubinstein,et al.  Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region , 2018, Science.

[3]  Guo-Cheng Yuan,et al.  Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+ , 2019, Nature.

[4]  Leland McInnes,et al.  UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction , 2018, ArXiv.

[5]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Multimodal Brain-Tumor Segmentation Based on Dirichlet Process Mixture Model with Anisotropic Diffusion and Markov Random Field Prior , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[6]  Chenglong Xia,et al.  Spatial transcriptome profiling by MERFISH reveals subcellular RNA compartmentalization and cell cycle-dependent gene expression , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Simon Dirmeier,et al.  Structured hierarchical models for probabilistic inference from perturbation screening data , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  Xiaowei Zhuang,et al.  Genome-Scale Imaging of the 3D Organization and Transcriptional Activity of Chromatin , 2020, Cell.

[9]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  The Human Cell Atlas , 2017, bioRxiv.

[10]  Dmitry Vetrov,et al.  Learning a Model for Shape-Constrained Image Segmentation from Weakly Labeled Data , 2013, EMMCVPR.

[11]  Chika Yokota,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of cell fate decisions in murine neural crest , 2019, Science.

[12]  Zhenzhou Wang,et al.  Cell Segmentation for Image Cytometry: Advances, Insufficiencies, and Challenges , 2018, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[13]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling , 2019, Nature Methods.

[14]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  Guocheng Yuan,et al.  Identification of spatially associated subpopulations by combining scRNA-seq and sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization data , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  Probabilistic cell typing enables fine mapping of closely related cell types in situ , 2019, Nature Methods.

[17]  Roland Eils,et al.  Cell segmentation-free inference of cell types from in situ transcriptomics data , 2019, Nature Communications.

[18]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution , 2019, Science.

[19]  Lars E. Borm,et al.  Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH , 2018, Nature Methods.

[20]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  ImageJ for the Next Generation of Scientific Image Data , 2019, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[21]  Lars E. Borm,et al.  The promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing , 2017, Science.

[22]  Carolina Wählby,et al.  In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[23]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex , 2019, Nature.

[24]  William E. Allen,et al.  Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states , 2018, Science.

[25]  George M. Church,et al.  Highly Multiplexed Subcellular RNA Sequencing in Situ , 2014, Science.

[26]  Joakim Lundeberg,et al.  Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer’s Disease , 2020, Cell.

[27]  Shila Ghazanfar,et al.  The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program , 2019, Nature.

[28]  M. Ford,et al.  Single‐Cell Transcriptomics Comes of Age , 2016, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.