Taxing virgin natural resources: Lessons from aggregates taxation in Europe☆

The objective of this review paper is to analyze the efficiency of environmentally motivated taxes on virgin raw materials. We analyze both the economic–theoretical foundations of virgin natural resource taxation, and the empirical experiences of aggregates taxes i.e., taxes on, for instance, gravel, rock, stone, etc. in three European countries. These include Sweden, Denmark and the United Kingdom. The theoretical analysis indicates that taxing natural resource output or use typically represents a ‘second-best’ policy alternative, which can be used when, for instance, the monitoring of non-point source emissions is difficult or efficient property rights regimes cannot be established. The empirical analysis shows that the European aggregate taxes have assisted in reducing virgin resource use in spite of the relatively low own-price responses. However, generators of recycled materials typically have few incentives to enhance their waste sorting activities in the presence of a tax on virgin materials. Unless additional policies to increase the supply of recycled materials are implemented, supply will not increase much even in the presence of high demand. Finally, although second-best taxes are sometimes motivated by the desire to keep administration costs low, they could come at the cost of improper incentives and of limited policy legitimacy.

[1]  R Yaron Llaslett,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE SUPPLY OF AGGREGATES. PHASE 2 , 1999 .

[2]  A. Bruvoll,et al.  Green Throughput Taxation: Environmental and Economic Consequences , 1998 .

[3]  Margaret Walls,et al.  Extended Product Responsibility: An Economic Assessment of Alternative Policies , 1999 .

[4]  J. Helliwell,et al.  THE TAXATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES , 1985 .

[5]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[6]  Hilary A. Sigman A comparison of public policies for lead recycling , 1995 .

[7]  David Pearce,et al.  Market-based approaches to solid waste management , 1993 .

[8]  William J. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy: Preface to the second edition , 1988 .

[9]  Hilary A. Sigman,et al.  The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste , 1997 .

[10]  T. Dinan,et al.  Economic Efficiency Effects of Alternative Policies for Reducing Waste Disposal , 1993 .

[11]  Annegrete Bruvoll,et al.  Taxing virgin materials: an approach to waste problems , 1998 .

[12]  Extending the environmental tax base : prerequisites for increased taxation of natural resources and chemical compounds , 2004 .

[13]  R. Stavins,et al.  Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments , 2002 .

[14]  M. Dicks A Handbook of Primary Commodities in the Global Economy , 2010 .

[15]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Global Waste Paper Recovery and Utilization , 2003 .

[16]  Allen K. Miedema,et al.  Fundamental economic comparisons of solid waste policy options , 1983 .

[17]  Other Effectiveness of environmental taxes and charges for managing sand, gravel and rock extraction in selected EU countries , 2008 .

[18]  T. Eichner Imperfect Competition in the Recycling Industry , 2005 .

[19]  A. Vatn Input versus Emission Taxes: Environmental Taxes in a Mass Balance and Transaction Costs Perspective , 1998 .

[20]  S. Brandt,et al.  Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management , 2004 .

[21]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[22]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Policy effectiveness and acceptance in the taxation of environmentally damaging chemical compounds , 2008 .

[23]  H. Hotelling The economics of exhaustible resources , 1931, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  D. Fullerton,et al.  Policies for Green Design , 1996 .

[25]  Thomas C. Kinnaman,et al.  Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping , 1993 .

[26]  T. Sterner,et al.  Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management , 2002 .

[27]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting , 2003 .

[28]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  The economics of secondary aluminium supply: An econometric analysis based on European data , 2009 .

[29]  C. Daugbjerg Power and Policy Design: A Comparison of Green Taxation in Scandinavian Agriculture , 1998 .

[30]  K. Conrad Resource and Waste Taxation in the Theory of the Firm with Recycling Activities , 1999 .

[31]  W. Baumol On recycling as a moot environmental issue , 1977 .

[32]  Margaret Walls,et al.  Upstream Pollution, Downstream Waste Disposal, and the Design of Comprehensive Environmental Policies , 2001 .

[33]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Valuing the Future , 2003 .

[34]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .