An Automatic Suturing Machine for Intestinal Anastomosis: Advantages Compared With Hand-Suturing Technique

One of the main procedures in intestinal surgery is anastomosis, which is mostly performed by stapling or hand suturing. Due to limitations of these methods, a novel automatic suturing machine was designed and fabricated in this study, equipped with a needle-driving system; a thread control mechanism, and a linear mechanism, which is applicable in intestinal anastomosis by making continuous sutures. The main advantages of the fabricated machine are employing biocompatible suture, from the tissue’s adaptation point of view, and making a uniform suturing pattern, independent of surgeon’s skill, and thus offering a greater strength than the hand-sutured specimen. In order to evaluate the capability of the fabricated machine and investigate the validity of the hypothesis made in this study, that is, a more uniform suture will result in a greater mechanical strength of the sutured tissue, in vitro tests were performed on human intestine specimens, which were manually sutured by an expert surgeon and by the automatic suturing machine. The tensile tests with an elongation rate of 5 mm/min were done for 90 specimens, in 9 groups with various suturing configurations. The optimum pattern, from the mechanical strength point of view, was found to be the same in both manual and automatic suturing methods, that is, h7d6 (h = distance of suture from the edge of the tissue = 7 mm, and d = distance between stitches = 6 mm). It was also shown that the maximum breaking strength, for the best suturing pattern, h7d6, is significantly greater when the automatic suturing machine was employed, compared with the hand-sutured tissue (P < .001).

[1]  J. Ruiz-Tovar,et al.  Postoperative complications of colon surgery. , 2010, Cirugia y cirujanos.

[2]  Sanaz Mosafer Khoorjestan,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS — A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOMATIC AND HAND SUTURING TECHNIQUES , 2016 .

[3]  S. Kourkoulis,et al.  Mechanical behavior of colonic anastomosis in experimental settings as a measure of wound repair and tissue integrity. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  K. Oberg,et al.  Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue , 2015, SpringerPlus.

[5]  E. Rodríguez Núñez,et al.  Experimental study of sutureless colorectal anastomosis. , 2000, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[6]  C. Pither,et al.  Antiemetic effect of nonabine in cancer chemotherapy , 1983, British medical journal.

[7]  Erhan Aysan,et al.  A novel colonic anastomosis technique involving fixed polyglycolic acid mesh. , 2010, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[8]  Y. Ho,et al.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. , 2010, World journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  E. Prager,et al.  Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery , 1989, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

[10]  Pauline Goske Surgical Technology Principles and Practice , 1982 .

[11]  A. Fingerhut,et al.  Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. , 1994, Surgery.

[12]  R. McLeod,et al.  Handsewnvs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  S. Park,et al.  Intestinal Anastomosis by Use of a Memory-shaped Compression Anastomosis Clip (Hand CAC 30): Early Clinical Experience , 2012, Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.

[14]  X. Liang,et al.  Experimental study of colonic anastomosis with a degradable stent in a porcine model. , 2010, American journal of surgery.