Genetic Diversity of Pea ( Pisum arvense L . ) Genotypes According to the Tissue Culture Traits

Sufficient knowledge of genetic variation and germplasm classification is necessary to select suitable parents for breeding purposes. Effective and repeatable tissue culture method is a prerequisite for genetic engineering of pea genotypes (Pisum arvense L.). In this study, genetic diversity of forty-two pea genotypes (Pisum arvense L.) was evaluated based on callus induction capacity, embryogenic callus production and plant regeneration ability. Significant variation was observed among genotypes based on tissue culture parameters. The results of ANOVA indicated significant (P<0.01) differences among genotypes for traits callus induction, embryogenic callus, responded embryogenic callus, number of somatic embryos, responded somatic embryogenesis, regeneration efficiency and number of regenerated plantlet. Cluster analysis based on the tissue culture traits classified the genotypes into four groups. The highest genetic distance was observed between Subatan and Ovaçevirme-3 genotypes. The relationships among parameters related to tissue culture were investigated by principle component analysis (PCA). The PCA1 and PCA2 axes accounted 80.43% of total variation, mainly distinguish the indices in different groups.

[1]  M. Miransari,et al.  Genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes based on cluster and principal component analyses for breeding strategies , 2011 .

[2]  Md. Abdur Rahim,et al.  Genetic Variability, Character Association and Genetic Divergence in Mungbean ('Vigna radiata' L. Wilczek) , 2010 .

[3]  M. Naghavi,et al.  Assessing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genetic diversity using quality traits, amplified fragment length polymorphisms, simple sequence repeats and proteome analysis , 2008 .

[4]  P. Larkin,et al.  Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement , 1981, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[5]  C. Rameau,et al.  Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.) , 2005, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  M. Salam,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Irrigated Rice , 2004 .

[7]  M. Griga Morphology and Anatomy of Pisum Sativum Somatic Embryos , 2002, Biologia Plantarum.

[8]  M. Griga Direct somatic embryogenesis from shoot apical meristems of pea, and thidiazuron-induced high conversion rate of somatic embryos , 1998, Biologia Plantarum.

[9]  W. F. Campbell,et al.  Induction of embryogenic Triticum aestivum L. calli. I. Quantification of genotype and culture medium effects , 2004, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[10]  B. Joshi,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Nepalese Wheat Cultivars Based on Agro-Morphological Traits and Coefficients of Parentage , 2004 .

[11]  C. Vance,et al.  Legumes: Importance and Constraints to Greater Use , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[12]  S. Chapman,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower: II. Three-mode principal component analysis of oil and biomass yield across environments in Argentina , 2001 .

[13]  S. Dhir,et al.  In Vitro Culture of Wheat and Genetic Transformation — Retrospect and Prospect , 1995 .

[14]  B. Carver,et al.  Regression and Cluster Analysis of Environmental Responses of Hybrid and Pureline Winter Wheat Cultivars 1 , 1987 .

[15]  B. Ahloowalia Plant Regeneration from Callus Culture in Wheat 1 , 1982 .

[16]  B. R. Murty,et al.  Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in linseed , 1968 .