Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving

Three studies were conducted to examine the relation of spatial visualization to solving kinematics problems that involved either predicting the two-dimensional motion of an object, translating from one frame of reference to another, or interpreting kinematics graphs. In Study 1, 60 physics-naíve students were administered kinematics problems and spatial visualization ability tests. In Study 2, 17 (8 high- and 9 low-spatial ability) additional students completed think-aloud protocols while they solved the kinematics problems. In Study 3, the eye movements of fifteen (9 high- and 6 low-spatial ability) students were recorded while the students solved kinematics problems. In contrast to high-spatial students, most low-spatial students did not combine two motion vectors, were unable to switch frames of reference, and tended to interpret graphs literally. The results of the study suggest an important relationship between spatial visualization ability and solving kinematics problems with multiple spatial parameters.

[1]  Renee L. Babcock,et al.  Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability , 1990 .

[2]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[3]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[4]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects , 2001, Psychological research.

[6]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  The psychological structure of naive impetus conceptions , 1989 .

[7]  Michael C. Pyryt Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[8]  L. Stark,et al.  Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Bruno Laeng,et al.  Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  M. Just,et al.  Graded Functional Activation in the Visuospatial System with the Amount of Task Demand , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Abilities in Problem Solving in Kinematics , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.

[13]  H. Hecht,et al.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  David F. Lohman,et al.  Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. , 1988 .

[15]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[16]  N. Nersessian Should Physicists Preach What They Practice , 1995 .

[17]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[18]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[19]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  John J. Clement,et al.  A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students , 1983 .

[21]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[23]  S. Kay On the Nature of Expertise. , 1992 .

[24]  S. G. Eckstein,et al.  Parallelism in the development of children's ideas and the historical development of projectile motion theories , 1997 .

[25]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Real-Time Data Display, Spatial Visualization Ability, and Learning Force and Motion Concepts , 2006 .

[26]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[27]  David A. Rettinger,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  M A Just,et al.  Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[30]  I. Macfarlane Smith,et al.  Spatial ability : its educational and social significance , 1965 .

[31]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  M. McCloskey Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[33]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[34]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  N. Nersessian Should physicists preach what they practice? , 1995 .

[36]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Students' Use of Imagery in Solving Qualitative Problems in Kinematics. , 1999 .

[37]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[38]  R. Sternberg Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .